Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29095245›Full record

Trial reportRegional anesthesia and pain medicine2018

Prospective, Multicenter, Randomized, Crossover Clinical Trial Comparing the Safety and Effectiveness of Cooled Radiofrequency Ablation With Corticosteroid Injection in the Management of Knee Pain From Osteoarthritis.

Tim Davis, Eric Loudermilk, Michael DePalma, Corey Hunter, David Lindley, Nilesh Patel, Daniel Choi, Marc Soloman, Anita Gupta, Mehul Desai and 2 more

5 registry-linked trialsOpen access · hybridAbstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Regional anesthesia and pain medicine, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 5 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 83 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
83citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
16.1field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02343003 nacompletednot on this map

A Prospective, Multi-Center, RCT Evaluating the Safety and Effectiveness of Coolief™ Cooled Radiofrequency Probe to Create Lesions of the Genicular Nerves and Comparing Corticosteroid Injection in the Management of Knee Pain

TypeinterventionalSponsorHalyard HealthRan2015 to 2017Enrolled151ConditionsOsteoarthritis of the KneeArmsCooled Radiofrequency, Corticosteroid injection
NCT04275128 terminatednot on this mapstarted 2020, after this paper: background citation

Cooled Genicular Radiofrequency Ablation Versus Conventional Genicular Radiofrequency Ablation for the Treatment of Chronic Knee Pain: A Prospective Study

TypeobservationalSponsorHenry Ford Health SystemRan2020 to 2020Enrolled1ConditionsChronic Knee PainArmsCooled radiofrequency ablation, Conventional radiofrequency ablation
NCT04329884 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2019, after this paper: background citation

Use of Cooled Radiofrequency for the Treatment of Hip Pain Associated With OA of the Hip Compared to Intra-articular Steroid Injections

TypeinterventionalSponsorBrigham and Women's HospitalRan2019 to 2022Enrolled60ConditionsOsteoarthritis, HipArmsCooled RFA treatment with COOLIEF* device, intra-articular corticosteroid injection
NCT05604144 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

A Proof-of-Concept Study to Define the Safety, Efficacy and Feasibility of Cryoanalgesia (Iovera°®) for the Treatment of Pain in Subjects With Morton's Neuroma

TypeinterventionalSponsorNorthern California Research Trials, Inc.Ran2022 to 2023Enrolled5ConditionsMorton's Neuroma, Pain ManagementArmsCryoanalgesia (iovera°®)
NCT06000709 phase4unknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

Randomized, Double-blinded, Comparison Between Ultrasound-Guided Genicular Nerve Phenol Neurolysis and Intra-articular Steroid Injections

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of ManitobaRan2023 to 2024Enrolled40ConditionsOsteoarthritis, Knee, Chronic Knee PainArms6% aqueous phenol, MethylPREDNISolone 40 MG, Intraarticular Knee Placebo, Genicular Nerve Placebo
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

83 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 204 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Trial
  15. Trial
  16. Trial
  17. Cooled radiofrequency ablation for patients with chronic postsurgical pain after total knee arthroplasty: Pilot clinical trial.Asia-Pacific journal of sports medicine, arthroscopy, rehabilitation and technology · 2026
    Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article

23 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 9 institutions in 1 country.

Tim Davis
Eric Loudermilk
Michael DePalma
Corey Hunter
David Lindley
Nilesh Patel
Daniel Choi
Marc Soloman
Anita Gupta
Mehul Desai
Asokumar Buvanendran
Leonardo Kapural
Pain Management Institute · USAinsworth Institute of Pain Management · USArizona Pain Specialists · USCarolinas Pain Institute · USDrexel University · USInternational Spine, Pain & Performance · USMedical Advanced Pain Specialists · USRush University Medical Center · USVirginia Spine Research Institute · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

objectivesOsteoarthritis (OA) of the knee affects the aging population and has an associated influence on the health care system. Rigorous studies evaluating radiofrequency ablation for OA-related knee pain are lacking. This study compared long-term clinical safety and effectiveness of cooled radiofrequency ablation (CRFA) with intra-articular steroid (IAS) injection in managing OA-related knee pain.

methodsThis is a prospective, multicenter, randomized trial with 151 subjects with chronic (≥6 months) knee pain that was unresponsive to conservative modalities. Knee pain (Numeric Rating Scale [NRS]), Oxford Knee Score, overall treatment effect (Global Perceived Effect), analgesic drug use, and adverse events were compared between CRFA and IAS cohorts at 1, 3, and 6 months after intervention.

resultsThere were no differences in demographics between study groups. At 6 months, the CRFA group had more favorable outcomes in NRS: pain reduction 50% or greater: 74.1% versus 16.2%, P < 0.0001 (25.9% and 83.8% of these study cohorts, respectively, were nonresponders). Mean NRS score reduction was 4.9 ± 2.4 versus 1.3 ± 2.2, P < 0.0001; mean Oxford Knee Score was 35.7 ± 8.8 vs 22.4 ± 8.5, P < 0.0001; mean improved Global Perceived Effect was 91.4% vs 23.9%, P < 0.0001; and mean change in nonopioid medication use was CRFA > IAS (P = 0.02). There were no procedure-related serious adverse events.

conclusionsThis study demonstrates that CRFA is an effective long-term therapeutic option for managing pain and improving physical function and quality of life for patients with painful knee OA when compared with IAS injection. CLINICAL

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02343003).

Indexed as

Catheter AblationAdrenal Cortex HormonesAgedAnalgesicsArthralgiaBetamethasoneCombined Modality TherapyCross-Over StudiesDenervationFemaleHumansInjections, Intra-ArticularKnee JointMaleMethylprednisoloneMethylprednisolone AcetateAdrenal Cortex HormonesAnalgesicsBetamethasoneMethylprednisoloneMethylprednisolone AcetateTriamcinolone Acetonide

Identifiers

PMID29095245
PMCPMC5768219
OpenAlexW2766034154

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.