Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29095154›Full record

ArticleActa crystallographica. Section F, Structural biology communications2017

Crystallization and X-ray diffraction analysis of native and selenomethionine-substituted PhyH-DI from Bacillus sp. HJB17.

Fang Lu, Bei Zhang, Yong Liu, Ying Song, Gangxing Guo, Duo Feng, Huoqing Huang, Peilong Yang, Wei Gao, Sujuan Guo and 1 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Acta crystallographica. Section F, Structural biology communications, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 93% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Research status of3 Biotech · 2021
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Fang LuSchool of Science, Beijing Forestry University, 35 Qinghuadong Road, Haidian District, Beijing 100083, People's Republic of China.
Bei ZhangSchool of Science, Beijing Forestry University, 35 Qinghuadong Road, Haidian District, Beijing 100083, People's Republic of China.
Yong LiuSchool of Science, Beijing Forestry University, 35 Qinghuadong Road, Haidian District, Beijing 100083, People's Republic of China.
Ying SongSchool of Science, Beijing Forestry University, 35 Qinghuadong Road, Haidian District, Beijing 100083, People's Republic of China.
Gangxing GuoSchool of Science, Beijing Forestry University, 35 Qinghuadong Road, Haidian District, Beijing 100083, People's Republic of China.
Duo FengSchool of Science, Beijing Forestry University, 35 Qinghuadong Road, Haidian District, Beijing 100083, People's Republic of China.
Huoqing HuangKey Laboratory for Feed Biotechnology of the Ministry of Agriculture, Feed Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, 12 Zhongguancun South Street, Beijing 100081, People's Republic of China.
Peilong YangKey Laboratory for Feed Biotechnology of the Ministry of Agriculture, Feed Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, 12 Zhongguancun South Street, Beijing 100081, People's Republic of China.
Wei GaoSchool of Science, Beijing Forestry University, 35 Qinghuadong Road, Haidian District, Beijing 100083, People's Republic of China.
Sujuan GuoKey Laboratory for Silviculture and Conservation, Ministry of Education, Beijing Forestry University, 35 Qinghuadong Road, Haidian District, Beijing 100083, People's Republic of China.
Bin YaoKey Laboratory for Feed Biotechnology of the Ministry of Agriculture, Feed Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, 12 Zhongguancun South Street, Beijing 100081, People's Republic of China.
Beijing Forestry University · CNChinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences · CN

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China 31070651The Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities 2015ZCQ-LY-02
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Phytases are phosphatases that hydrolyze phytates to less phosphorylated myo-inositol derivatives and inorganic phosphate. β-Propeller phytases, which are very diverse phytases with improved thermostability that are active at neutral and alkaline pH and have absolute substrate specificity, are ideal substitutes for other commercial phytases. PhyH-DI, a β-propeller phytase from Bacillus sp. HJB17, was found to act synergistically with other single-domain phytases and can increase their efficiency in the hydrolysis of phytate. Crystals of native and selenomethionine-substituted PhyH-DI were obtained using the vapour-diffusion method in a condition consisting of 0.2 M sodium chloride, 0.1 M Tris pH 8.5, 25%(w/v) PEG 3350 at 289 K. X-ray diffraction data were collected to 3.00 and 2.70 Å resolution, respectively, at 100 K. Native PhyH-DI crystals belonged to space group C121, with unit-cell parameters a = 156.84, b = 45.54, c = 97.64 Å, α = 90.00, β = 125.86, γ = 90.00°. The asymmetric unit contained two molecules of PhyH-DI, with a corresponding Matthews coefficient of 2.17 Å

Indexed as

X-Ray Diffraction6-PhytaseBacillusCrystallizationHydrolysisSelenomethionineSubstrate Specificity6-PhytaseSelenomethioninecrystallizationselenomethionine-substituted proteinX-ray diffractionβ-propeller phytases

Identifiers

PMID29095154
PMCPMC5683030
OpenAlexW2766081436

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.