Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29095096›Full record

ReviewNucleus (Austin, Tex.)2018

Nuclear pore complexes as hubs for gene regulation.

Maximiliano A D'Angelo

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Nucleus (Austin, Tex.), 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 42 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
42citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

42 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. A multiomics atlas of theScience advances · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Nuclear mRNA export.Acta biochimica et biophysica Sinica · 2024
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Coatomer in the universe of cellular complexity.Molecular biology of the cell · 2022
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Maximiliano A D'Angeloa Sanford Burnham Prebys Medical Discovery Institute, Development, Aging and Regeneration Program, NCI-Designated Cancer Center , 10901 N. Torrey Pines Road, La Jolla , CA , United States.

Funding

Mechanisms of Nup210 Regulation of Muscle Development and RegenerationR01AR065083 · NIAMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI DANGELO, MAXIMILIANO A · 2014 to 2018
$2.8M
NIAMS NIH HHS R01 AR065083
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Nuclear pore complexes (NPCs), the channels connecting the nucleus with the cytoplasm, are the largest protein structures of the nuclear envelope. In addition to their role in regulating nucleocytoplasmic transport, increasing evidence shows that these multiprotein structures play central roles in the regulation of gene activity. In light of recent discoveries, NPCs are emerging as scaffolds that mediate the regulation of specific gene sets at the nuclear periphery. The function of NPCs as genome organizers and hubs for transcriptional regulation provides additional evidence that the compartmentalization of genes and transcriptional regulators within the nuclear space is an important mechanism of gene expression regulation.

Indexed as

Gene Expression RegulationAnimalsHumansNuclear Pore Complex ProteinsNuclear Pore Complex Proteinsgene expressionMusclenuclear envelopeNuclear pore complexnuclear transportNucleoporintranscription

Identifiers

PMID29095096
PMCPMC5973259

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.