Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29095036›Full record

ArticleArchives of pathology & laboratory medicine2018

Novel Modification of HistoGel-Based Cell Block Preparation Method: Improved Sufficiency for Molecular Studies.

Natasha Rekhtman, Darren J Buonocore, Dorota Rudomina, Maria Friedlander, Crisbane Dsouza, Gitika Aggarwal, Maria Arcila, Marcia Edelweiss, Oscar Lin

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 38 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Establishing 3D Endometrial Organoids from the Mouse Uterus.Journal of visualized experiments : JoVE · 2023
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. UltrarapidJTO clinical and research reports · 2020
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Best Practices Recommendations for Diagnostic Immunohistochemistry in Lung Cancer.Journal of thoracic oncology : official publication of the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer · 2019
    Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Natasha Rekhtman
Darren J Buonocore
Dorota Rudomina
Maria Friedlander
Crisbane Dsouza
Gitika Aggarwal
Maria Arcila
Marcia Edelweiss
Oscar LinFrom the Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York. Drs Rekhtman and Buonocore contributed equally in the preparation of this article and should be considered as cofirst authors.
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center · US

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI Nicholas D Socci · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

context- Cell block preparation methods vary substantially across institutions and are frequently suboptimal. The growing importance of biomarker testing in the era of targeted therapies makes optimization of cell block preparation critically important.

objective- To develop an improved cell block preparation method.

design- Ex vivo fine-needle aspirates and scrapes from surgically resected tumors were used to develop an improved HistoGel (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, Massachusetts)-based cell block preparation method. Cellularity yield with the new versus the standard method was assessed in ex vivo split samples and in consecutive clinical fine-needle aspirates processed before (n = 100) and after (n = 100) the new method was implemented in our laboratory. Sufficiency of cell block material for potential molecular studies was estimated by manual cell quantitation.

results- The key modification in the new method was pretreatment of the pelleted cells with 95% ethanol before the addition of HistoGel (HistoGel + ethanol method). In addition, we optimized the melting conditions of HistoGel and added a dark, inorganic marker to the cell pellets to highlight the desired level of sectioning during microtomy. Cell blocks from ex vivo split samples showed that the HistoGel + ethanol method yielded, on average, an 8.3-fold (range, 1-20) greater cellularity compared with the standard HistoGel-only method. After the switch from the standard HistoGel method to the modified method in our clinical practice, sufficiency of positive fine-needle aspirates for some molecular studies increased from 72% to 97% ( P = .002).

conclusions- We describe a simple and readily adoptable modification of the HistoGel method, which results in substantial improvement in cell capture in cell blocks, leading to a significant increase in sufficiency for potential molecular and other ancillary studies.

Indexed as

Biomarkers, TumorHistocytological Preparation TechniquesHumansNeoplasmsPathology, MolecularBiomarkers, Tumor

Identifiers

PMID29095036
PMCPMC7437143
OpenAlexW2766177281

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.