Trial reportImmunity, inflammation and disease2018
Disparities in rate, triggers, and management in pediatric and adult cases of suspected drug-induced anaphylaxis in Canada.
Trial report in Immunity, inflammation and disease, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 37 citations in OpenAlex.
- Triggers, clinical spectra and outcomes of pediatric anaphylaxis in a tertiary center: impact of comorbidities and cofactors on severity.Allergy, asthma, and clinical immunology : official journal of the Canadian Society of Allergy and Clinical Immunology · 2026Article
- Drug-Induced Anaphylaxis in Children: A Comparative Analysis of Inpatient versus Outpatient Settings.International archives of allergy and immunology · 2026Article
- Evaluation of drug-related anaphylaxis in children: multi-center study.European journal of pediatrics · 2025Article
- Drug-Induced Anaphylaxis in Children.Biomedicines · 2024Review
- Identifying the most at-risk age-group and longitudinal trends of drug allergy labeling amongst 7.3 million individuals in Hong Kong.BMC medicine · 2024Article
- Drug-Related Hypersensitivity Reactions Leading to Emergency Department: Original Data and Systematic Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2022Article
- Drug Allergy in Children: What Should We Know?Clinical and experimental pediatrics · 2020Article
- Sex and Gender Aspects for Patient Stratification in Allergy Prevention and Treatment.International journal of molecular sciences · 2020Review
- Drug Allergy Profile From a National Drug Allergy Registry.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2020Article
- Pediatric Drug Hypersensitivity.Current allergy and asthma reports · 2019Review
- Anaphylaxis to patent blue dye in a 17-year-old boy.BMJ case reports · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors at 9 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionData is sparse on drug-induced anaphylaxis (DIA) and there have not been studies assessing the differences in clinical characteristics and management of DIA between adults and children.
objectiveWe assessed the percentage, diagnosis, and management of DIA among all anaphylaxis visits in three pediatric and one adult emergency departments (ED) across Canada.
methodsChildren presenting to the Montreal Children's Hospital (MCH), British Columbia Children's Hospital (BCCH), and Children's Hospital at London Health Sciences Center and adults presenting to Hôpital du Sacré-Coeur with anaphylaxis were recruited as part of the Cross-Canada Anaphylaxis Registry. A standardized data form documenting the reaction and management was completed and patients were followed annually to determine assessment by allergist and use of confirmatory tests.
resultsFrom June 2012 to May 2016, 51 children were recruited from the pediatric centers and 64 adults from the adult center with drug-induced anaphyalxis. More than half the cases were prospectively recruited. The percentage of DIA among all cases of anaphylaxis was similar in all three pediatric centers but higher in the adult center in Montreal. Most reactions in children were triggered by non-antibiotic drugs, and in adults, by antibiotics. The majority of adults and a third of children did not see an allergist after the initial reaction. In those that did see an allergist, diagnosis was established by either a skin test or an oral challenge in less than 20% of cases.
conclusionsOur results reveal disparities in rate, culprit, and management of DIA in children versus adults. Further, most cases of suspected drug allergy are not appropriately diagnosed. Guidelines to improve assessment and diagnosis of DIA are required.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.