Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29094478›Full record

ArticleMicrobial biotechnology2018

A standardized workflow for surveying recombinases expands bacterial genome-editing capabilities.

Deirdre E Ricaurte, Esteban Martínez-García, Ákos Nyerges, Csaba Pál, Víctor de Lorenzo, Tomás Aparicio

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Microbial biotechnology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Recombineering in Non-Model Bacteria.Current protocols · 2022
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Recombineering and MAGE.Nature reviews. Methods primers · 2021
    Article
  13. ACS synthetic biology · 2020
    Article
  14. Improved bacterial recombineering by parallelized protein discovery.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2020
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Directed evolution of multiple genomic loci allows the prediction of antibiotic resistance.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2018
    Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Deirdre E RicaurteSystems Biology Program, Centro Nacional de Biotecnología (CNB-CSIC), Campus de Cantoblanco, Madrid, 28049, Spain.
Esteban Martínez-GarcíaSystems Biology Program, Centro Nacional de Biotecnología (CNB-CSIC), Campus de Cantoblanco, Madrid, 28049, Spain.
Ákos NyergesSynthetic and Systems Biology Unit, Institute of Biochemistry, Biological Research Centre of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences, Szeged, H-6726, Hungary.
Csaba PálSynthetic and Systems Biology Unit, Institute of Biochemistry, Biological Research Centre of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences, Szeged, H-6726, Hungary.
Víctor de LorenzoSystems Biology Program, Centro Nacional de Biotecnología (CNB-CSIC), Campus de Cantoblanco, Madrid, 28049, Spain.
Tomás AparicioSystems Biology Program, Centro Nacional de Biotecnología (CNB-CSIC), Campus de Cantoblanco, Madrid, 28049, Spain.

Funding

European Research Council 648364Wellcome Trust 084314
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bacterial recombineering typically relies on genomic incorporation of synthetic oligonucleotides as mediated by Escherichia coli λ phage recombinase β - an occurrence largely limited to enterobacterial strains. While a handful of similar recombinases have been documented, recombineering efficiencies usually fall short of expectations for practical use. In this work, we aimed to find an efficient Recβ homologue demonstrating activity in model soil bacterium Pseudomonas putida EM42. To this end, a genus-wide protein survey was conducted to identify putative recombinase candidates for study. Selected novel proteins were assayed in a standardized test to reveal their ability to introduce the K43T substitution into the rpsL gene of P. putida. An ERF superfamily protein, here termed Rec2, exhibited activity eightfold greater than that of the previous leading recombinase. To bolster these results, we demonstrated Rec2 ability to enter a range of mutations into the pyrF gene of P. putida at similar frequencies. Our results not only confirm the utility of Rec2 as a Recβ functional analogue within the P. putida model system, but also set a complete workflow for deploying recombineering in other bacterial strains/species. Implications range from genome editing of P. putida for metabolic engineering to extended applications within other Pseudomonads - and beyond.

Indexed as

Genome, BacterialEscherichia coli ProteinsGene EditingGenetics, MicrobialPseudomonas putidaRecombinasesRecombination, GeneticRibosomal Protein S9WorkflowEscherichia coli ProteinsRecombinasesRibosomal Protein S9RpsI protein, E coli

Identifiers

PMID29094478
PMCPMC5743808

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.