Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29094383›Full record

ArticleCognitive science2018

Social Beliefs and Visual Attention: How the Social Relevance of a Cue Influences Spatial Orienting.

Matthias S Gobel, Miles R A Tufft, Daniel C Richardson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cognitive science, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. I see you, you see me: the impact of social presence on social interaction processes in autistic and non-autistic people.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2023
    Review
  9. Gaze cueing, mental States, and the effect of autistic traits.Attention, perception & psychophysics · 2023
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Ordinality and Verbal Framing Influence Preschoolers' Memory for Spatial Structure.Journal of cognition and development : official journal of the Cognitive Development Society · 2023
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Sensitivity to Social Agency in Autistic Adults.Journal of autism and developmental disorders · 2021
    Article
  14. Social Agency as a continuum.Psychonomic bulletin & review · 2021
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Brain stimulation to left prefrontal cortex modulates attentional orienting to gaze cues.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2019
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Matthias S GobelSAGE Center for the Study of the Mind, Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, University of California at Santa Barbara.
Miles R A TufftDepartment of Experimental Psychology, University College London.
Daniel C RichardsonDepartment of Experimental Psychology, University College London.

Funding

Wellcome TrustWellcome Trust WT105128AIA
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We are highly tuned to each other's visual attention. Perceiving the eye or hand movements of another person can influence the timing of a saccade or the reach of our own. However, the explanation for such spatial orienting in interpersonal contexts remains disputed. Is it due to the social appearance of the cue-a hand or an eye-or due to its social relevance-a cue that is connected to another person with attentional and intentional states? We developed an interpersonal version of the Posner spatial cueing paradigm. Participants saw a cue and detected a target at the same or a different location, while interacting with an unseen partner. Participants were led to believe that the cue was either connected to the gaze location of their partner or was generated randomly by a computer (Experiment 1), and that their partner had higher or lower social rank while engaged in the same or a different task (Experiment 2). We found that spatial cue-target compatibility effects were greater when the cue related to a partner's gaze. This effect was amplified by the partner's social rank, but only when participants believed their partner was engaged in the same task. Taken together, this is strong evidence in support of the idea that spatial orienting is interpersonally attuned to the social relevance of the cue-whether the cue is connected to another person, who this person is, and what this person is doing-and does not exclusively rely on the social appearance of the cue. Visual attention is not only guided by the physical salience of one's environment but also by the mental representation of its social relevance.

Indexed as

AttentionCuesCultureOrientation, SpatialSocial PerceptionAdultFemaleHumansMaleReaction TimeVisual PerceptionYoung AdultAttentionInhibition of returnJoint actionSocial cognitionSocial statusSpatial cueing

Identifiers

PMID29094383
PMCPMC5969099

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.