Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29094297›Full record

ArticleJournal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology2018

Prognostic accuracy of myocardial perfusion imaging in octogenarians.

Francesco Nudi, Giuseppe Biondi-Zoccai, Orazio Schillaci, Natale di Belardino, Francesco Versaci, Alessandro Nudi, Annamaria Pinto, Giandomenico Neri, Enrica Procaccini, Giacomo Frati and 1 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Older patients with cardiovascular disease: A new frontier for nuclear cardiology?Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2019
    Article
  5. Hybrid anatomo-functional imaging of coronary artery disease: Beneficial irrespective of its core components.Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2019
    Review
  6. To the heart of the matter; a valentine's day to remember.Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2019
    Article
  7. Role of myocardial perfusion scintigraphy in octogenarians: Time for reappraisal?Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2018
    Article
  8. Bridging the Atlantic gap in clinical guidelines for non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndromes.Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2018
    Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.

Francesco NudiService of Nuclear Cardiology, Madonna della Fiducia Clinic, Rome, Italy. francesco.nudi@gmail.com.
Giuseppe Biondi-ZoccaiDepartment of Medico-Surgical Sciences and Biotechnologies, Sapienza University of Rome, Latina, Italy.
Orazio SchillaciDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Tor Vergata University, Rome, Italy.
Natale di BelardinoDivision of Cardiology, Anzio-Nettuno Hospital, Anzio, Italy.
Francesco VersaciDivision of Cardiology, S. Maria Goretti Hospital, Latina, Italy.
Alessandro NudiETISAN, Rome, Italy.
Annamaria PintoService of Nuclear Cardiology, Madonna della Fiducia Clinic, Rome, Italy.
Giandomenico NeriService of Nuclear Cardiology, Madonna della Fiducia Clinic, Rome, Italy.
Enrica ProcacciniService of Nuclear Cardiology, Madonna della Fiducia Clinic, Rome, Italy.
Giacomo FratiDepartment of Medico-Surgical Sciences and Biotechnologies, Sapienza University of Rome, Latina, Italy.
Ami E IskandrianDivision of Cardiovascular Disease, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA.
Ospedale Madonna Delle Grazie · ITIstituto Neurologico Mediterraneo · ITOspedale Santa Maria Goretti · ITSapienza University of Rome · ITUniversity of Alabama at Birmingham · USUniversity of Rome Tor Vergata · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMyocardial perfusion imaging (MPI) has an established role in the work-up of coronary artery disease (CAD), but its comparative accuracy is debated in elderly patients. We examined a large administrative database to appraise the performance of MPI in octogenarians.

methodsOur institutional database was queried for patients undergoing MPI without recent coronary revascularization or myocardial infarction (MI). We compared baseline, procedural, diagnostic, and prognostic features in patients aged < 80 vs ≥ 80 years with bivariate and propensity-adjusted analyses.

resultsFrom 13,254 patients, 12,737 (96.1%) were < 80 years old and 517 (3.9%) ≥ 80 years. Octogenarians were less likely to undergo exercise testing, had more severe and extensive myocardial ischemia (all P < 0.001), whereas CAD was more prevalent and diffuse in them (P = 0.012), and major adverse cardiac events more common during follow-up (P = 0.009). Diagnostic accuracy of MPI was similar or higher in octogenarians than in younger patients (e.g., sensitivity for three-vessel disease 92% in octogenarians vs 91% in younger patients), as was prognostic accuracy. Using propensity-matched analyses, MPI again yielded satisfactory prognostic accuracy in octogenarians.

conclusionsUse of MPI in octogenarians is associated with similar or better prognostic accuracy than in younger subjects.

Indexed as

AgedAged, 80 and overAge FactorsCoronary Artery DiseaseFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedMyocardial Perfusion ImagingPrognosisCoronary artery diseaseMyocardial ischemiaMyocardial perfusion imagingOctogenarians

Identifiers

PMID29094297
OpenAlexW2765566124

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.