Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29094092›Full record

ArticleJournal of global oncology2017

Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Individual Patient Data to Assess the Sensitivity of Cervical Cytology for Diagnosis of Cervical Cancer in Low- and Middle-Income Countries.

Alejandra Castanon, Rebecca Landy, Dimitrios Michalopoulos, Roshni Bhudia, Hannah Leaver, You Lin Qiao, Fanghui Zhao, Peter Sasieni

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of global oncology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 38% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Alejandra Castanonand Wolfson Institute of Preventive Medicine, London, United Kingdom; and and National Cancer Center and Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, China.
Rebecca Landyand Wolfson Institute of Preventive Medicine, London, United Kingdom; and and National Cancer Center and Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, China.
Dimitrios Michalopoulosand Wolfson Institute of Preventive Medicine, London, United Kingdom; and and National Cancer Center and Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, China.
Roshni Bhudiaand Wolfson Institute of Preventive Medicine, London, United Kingdom; and and National Cancer Center and Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, China.
Hannah Leaverand Wolfson Institute of Preventive Medicine, London, United Kingdom; and and National Cancer Center and Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, China.
You Lin Qiaoand Wolfson Institute of Preventive Medicine, London, United Kingdom; and and National Cancer Center and Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, China.
Fanghui Zhaoand Wolfson Institute of Preventive Medicine, London, United Kingdom; and and National Cancer Center and Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, China.
Peter Sasieniand Wolfson Institute of Preventive Medicine, London, United Kingdom; and and National Cancer Center and Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, China.
Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College · CN

Funding

Cancer Research UK 16892
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo assess the sensitivity of cervical cytology to cancer by pooling individual patient cytology results from cancers diagnosed in studies that assessed cervical screening in low- and middle-income countries.

methodsTwo authors reviewed studies identified through PubMed and Embase databases. We included studies that reported cervical cytology in which at least one woman was diagnosed with cervical cancer and in which abnormal cytology results were investigated at colposcopy and through a histologic sample (if appropriate). When cytology results were not reported in the manuscript, authors were contacted. Stratified analyses and meta-regression were performed to assess sources of heterogeneity between studies.

resultsWe included 717 cancers from 23 studies. The pooled sensitivity of cytology to cancer at a cutoff of a high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (HSIL) or worse was 79.4% (95% CI, 67.7% to 86.0%). Results from stratified analyses did not differ significantly, except among studies that recruited symptomatic women or women referred because of abnormal cytology, when the sensitivity of cytology was much higher (95.9%; 95% CI, 86.5% to 99.9%). The cutoff of an HSIL or worse detected 85% of the cancers that would have been detected at a cutoff of atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance or worse (relative sensitivity, 85.2%; 95% CI, 80.7% to 89.7%).

conclusionCytology at a high cutoff could be an excellent tool for targeted screening of populations at high risk of cervical cancer with a view to diagnose cancer at an earlier stage.

Identifiers

PMID29094092
PMCPMC5646897
OpenAlexW2594584267

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.