Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29094074›Full record

ArticleLaryngoscope investigative otolaryngology2017

Progressive resistance training in head and neck cancer patients undergoing concomitant chemoradiotherapy.

Camilla K Lonkvist, Anders Vinther, Bo Zerahn, Eva Rosenbom, Atul S Deshmukh, Pernille Hojman, Julie Gehl

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Laryngoscope investigative otolaryngology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Feasibility of a comprehensive supervised exercise program during and after treatment of head and neck cancer: a mixed-methods study.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2025
    Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Observational
  12. Article
  13. Feasibility and safety of Heavy Lifting Strength Training in Head and Neck Cancer survivors post-surgical neck dissection (the LIFTING trial).Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2023
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Letter to the editor referencing "Body composition changes in patients with head and neck cancer under active treatment: a scoping review".Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2022
    Article
  18. Patient and carer experience of nutrition care throughout and beyond treatment for head and neck cancer: a qualitative longitudinal study.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2022
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Camilla K LonkvistDepartment of Oncology, University of Copenhagen Herlev Denmark.
Anders VintherDepartment of Rehabilitation, University of Copenhagen Herlev Denmark.
Bo ZerahnDepartment of Clinical Physiology and Nuclear Medicine, University of Copenhagen Herlev Denmark.
Eva RosenbomNutritional Research Unit, Herlev and Gentofte Hospital, University of Copenhagen Herlev Denmark.
Atul S DeshmukhProteomics Program, Novo Nordisk Foundation Center for Protein Research, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen Copenhagen Denmark.
Pernille HojmanCentre of Inflammation and Metabolism and Centre for Physical Activity Research , Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen Copenhagen Denmark.
Julie GehlDepartment of Oncology, University of Copenhagen Herlev Denmark.ORCID 0000-0003-3829-0210
University of Copenhagen · DKCopenhagen University Hospital · DK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: Patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma undergoing concomitant chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) frequently experience weight loss, especially loss of lean body mass (LBM), and reduced functional performance. This study investigated whether a 12-week hospital-based progressive resistance training (PRT) program during CCRT is feasible in the clinical setting before planning initiation of a larger randomized study which is the long-term goal. Study design: Prospective pilot study. Methods: Twelve patients receiving CCRT were planned to attend a 12-week PRT program. Primary endpoint was feasibility measured as attendance to training sessions. Secondary endpoints included changes in functional performance, muscle strength, and body composition measured by Dual-energy X-ray Absorptiometry (DXA) scans. Furthermore, sarcomeric protein content, pentose phosphate pathway (PPP) activity, and glycolysis were determined in muscle biopsies. Results: Twelve patients with p16 positive oropharyngeal cancer were enrolled. The primary endpoint was met with 9 of the 12 patients completing at least 25 of 36 planned training sessions. The mean attendance rate was 77%. Functional performance was maintained during the treatment period and increased during follow-up ( Conclusion: Progressive resistance training is feasible and safe during CCRT for head and neck cancer, and is associated with high patient satisfaction. Level of Evidence: 2C.

Indexed as

body compositionexerciseHead and neck cancerlean body massprogressive resistance training

Identifiers

PMID29094074
PMCPMC5654939
OpenAlexW2723381681

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.