ArticleBJPsych international2016
Coercion in mental healthcare: time for a change in direction.
Article in BJPsych international, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Coercive containment measures for the management of self-cutting versus general disturbed behaviour: Differences in use and attitudes among mental health nursing staff.International journal of mental health nursing · 2022Article
- Measuring the level of compulsory hospitalisation in mental health care: The performance of different measures across areas and over time.International journal of methods in psychiatric research · 2021Article
- The omnipresence of risk and associated harms in secure and forensic mental health services in England and Wales.Social theory & health : STH · 2021Article
- Perceived Coercion of Persons with Mental Illness Living in a Community.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021Article
- A Key, Not a Straitjacket: The Case for Interim Mental Health Legislation Pending Complete Prohibition of Psychiatric Coercion in Accordance with the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities.Health and human rights · 2020Article
- Trends in the use of coercive measures in Finnish psychiatric hospitals: a register analysis of the past two decades.BMC psychiatry · 2019Article
- Factors associated with use of psychiatric intensive care and seclusion in adult inpatient mental health services.Epidemiology and psychiatric sciences · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Coercion has always been integral to the care and treatment of people who are mentally ill and there is no 'perfect' model in which coercion is absent. A number of interventions have shown promise in reducing the use of coercion, however, and we believe the evidence points to ways forward that may improve both the experience and the outcome of care.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.