ArticleComparative cytogenetics2017
Comparison of the genetic relationship between nine Cephalopod species based on cluster analysis of karyotype evolutionary distance.
Article in Comparative cytogenetics, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Rapid mid-Cretaceous diversification of squid and cuttlefish preceded radiation into coastal niches.Nature ecology & evolution · 2026Article
- A single-cell atlas of the bobtail squid visual and nervous system highlights molecular principles of convergent evolution.Nature ecology & evolution · 2025Article
- A chromosome-level reference genome for the common octopus, Octopus vulgaris (Cuvier, 1797).G3 (Bethesda, Md.) · 2023Article
- Transcriptomic analysis of oxidative stress mechanisms induced by acute nanoplastic exposure inFrontiers in physiology · 2023Article
- Article
- Genome and transcriptome mechanisms driving cephalopod evolution.Nature communications · 2022Article
- Deeply conserved synteny and the evolution of metazoan chromosomes.Science advances · 2022Article
- Genetic structure ofZooKeys · 2018Article
- Cytogenetic studies in three octopods,Comparative cytogenetics · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Karyotype analysis was carried out on gill cells of three species of octopods using a conventional air-drying method. The karyotype results showed that all the three species have the same diploid chromosome number, 2n=60, but with different karyograms as 2n=38M+6SM+8ST+8T, FN (fundamental number)=104 (
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.