Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29093724›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in plant science2017

Efficient CRISPR/Cas9 Genome Editing of

John Odipio, Titus Alicai, Ivan Ingelbrecht, Dmitri A Nusinow, Rebecca Bart, Nigel J Taylor

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in plant science, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 93 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
93citing papers in PubMed
30.4field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

93 citing papers in PubMed, 236 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Genome Editing in Root and Tuber Crop Development in Sub-Saharan Africa.Plant-environment interactions (Hoboken, N.J.) · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Development ofFrontiers in genome editing · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Efficient CRISPR/Frontiers in plant science · 2025
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article

33 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 4 countries.

John OdipioDonald Danforth Plant Science Center, St. Louis, MO, United States.
Titus AlicaiNational Crops Resources Research Institute, Kampala, Uganda.
Ivan IngelbrechtVlaams Instituut voor Biotechnologie, Department of Plant Biotechnology and Bioinformatics, Faculty of Sciences, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.
Dmitri A NusinowDonald Danforth Plant Science Center, St. Louis, MO, United States.
Rebecca BartDonald Danforth Plant Science Center, St. Louis, MO, United States.
Nigel J TaylorDonald Danforth Plant Science Center, St. Louis, MO, United States.
Donald Danforth Plant Science Center · USGhent University · BENational Agricultural Research Institute · UG

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

CRISPR/Cas9 has become a powerful genome-editing tool for introducing genetic changes into crop species. In order to develop capacity for CRISPR/Cas9 technology in the tropical staple cassava (

Indexed as

albinocassavaCRISPR/Cas9genome editingheterozygoushomozygousmutationPhytoene desaturase (PDS)

Identifiers

PMID29093724
PMCPMC5651273
OpenAlexW2757132436

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.