Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29093666›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in neural circuits2017

Radiate and Planar Multipolar Neurons of the Mouse Anteroventral Cochlear Nucleus: Intrinsic Excitability and Characterization of their Auditory Nerve Input.

Ruili Xie, Paul B Manis

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in neural circuits, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. KvThe Journal of physiology · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Selective Vulnerability of GABAergic Inhibitory Interneurons to Bilirubin Neurotoxicity in the Neonatal Brain.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Ruili XieDepartment of Neurosciences, University of Toledo, Toledo, OH, United States.
Paul B ManisDepartment of Otolaryngology/Head and Neck Surgery, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, United States.
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · USUniversity of Toledo · US

Funding

CELLULAR MECHANISMS OF AUDITORY INFORMATION PROCESSINGR01DC004551 · NIDCD · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI MANIS, PAUL B · 2000 to 2018
$5.9M
Synaptic mechanisms underlying noise-induced and age-related hearing lossR03DC013396 · NIDCD · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI XIE, RUILI · 2013 to 2015
$455k
NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC004551NIDCD NIH HHS R03 DC013396
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Radiate and planar neurons are the two major types of multipolar neurons in the ventral cochlear nucleus (VCN). Both cell types receive monosynaptic excitatory synaptic inputs from the auditory nerve, but have different responses to sound and project to different target regions and cells. Although the intrinsic physiology and synaptic inputs to planar neurons have been previously characterized, the radiate neurons are less common and have not been as well studied. We studied both types of multipolar neurons and characterized their properties including intrinsic excitability, synaptic dynamics of their auditory nerve inputs, as well as their neural firing properties to auditory nerve stimulation. Radiate neurons had a faster member time constant and higher threshold current to fire spikes than planar neurons, but the maximal firing rate is the same for both cell types upon large current injections. Compared to planar neurons, radiate neurons showed spontaneous postsynaptic currents with smaller size, and slower but variable kinetics. Auditory nerve stimulation progressively recruited synaptic inputs that were smaller and slower in radiate neurons, over a broader range of stimulus strength. Synaptic inputs to radiate neurons showed less depression than planar neurons during low rates of repetitive activity, but the synaptic depression at higher rates was similar between two cell types. However, due to the slow kinetics of the synaptic inputs, synaptic transmission in radiate neurons showed prominent temporal summation that contributed to greater synaptic depolarization and a higher firing rate for repetitive auditory nerve stimulation at high rates. Taken together, these results show that radiate multipolar neurons integrate a large number of weak synaptic inputs over a broad dynamic range, and have intrinsic and synaptic properties that are distinct from planar multipolar neurons. These properties enable radiate neurons to generate powerful inhibitory inputs to target neurons during high levels of afferent activity. Such robust inhibition is expected to dynamically modulate the excitability of many cell types in the cochlear nuclear complex.

Indexed as

Action PotentialsAnimalsCochlear NerveCochlear NucleusElectric StimulationExcitatory Postsynaptic PotentialsHearingMice, Inbred CBANeuronsPatch-Clamp TechniquesTissue Culture Techniquesauditory nerve inputcochlear nucleusexcitatory synaptic transmissioninhibitionplanarradiatestellate neuronsynaptic dynamics

Identifiers

PMID29093666
PMCPMC5651243
OpenAlexW2767145070

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.