Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29093571›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2017

Analysis of the CRISPR-Cas system in bacteriophages active on epidemic strains of Vibrio cholerae in Bangladesh.

Iftekhar Bin Naser, M Mozammel Hoque, M Ausrafuggaman Nahid, Tokee M Tareq, M Kamruzzaman Rocky, Shah M Faruque

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 38 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Genomic Insight intoPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Digging into the lesser-known aspects of CRISPR biology.International microbiology : the official journal of the Spanish Society for Microbiology · 2021
    Review
  9. Whole-Genome Sequence Data Analysis ofBioMed research international · 2021
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Competition between mobile genetic elements drives optimization of a phage-encoded CRISPR-Cas system: insights from a natural arms race.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2019
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Niche adaptation limits bacteriophage predation ofProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2019
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Iftekhar Bin NaserLaboratory Sciences and Services Division, International Centre for Diarrhoeal Disease Research, Dhaka, 1212, Bangladesh.
M Mozammel HoqueLaboratory Sciences and Services Division, International Centre for Diarrhoeal Disease Research, Dhaka, 1212, Bangladesh.
M Ausrafuggaman NahidLaboratory Sciences and Services Division, International Centre for Diarrhoeal Disease Research, Dhaka, 1212, Bangladesh.
Tokee M TareqLaboratory Sciences and Services Division, International Centre for Diarrhoeal Disease Research, Dhaka, 1212, Bangladesh.
M Kamruzzaman RockyLaboratory Sciences and Services Division, International Centre for Diarrhoeal Disease Research, Dhaka, 1212, Bangladesh.
Shah M FaruqueLaboratory Sciences and Services Division, International Centre for Diarrhoeal Disease Research, Dhaka, 1212, Bangladesh. faruque@icddrb.org.
International Centre for Diarrhoeal Disease Research · BD

Funding

Wellcome TrustWellcome Trust WT-105927/Z/14/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

CRISPR-Cas (clustered regularly interspersed short palindromic repeats-CRISPR-associated proteins) are microbial nuclease systems involved in defense against phages. Bacteria also resist phages by hosting phage-inducible chromosomal islands (PICI) which prevent phage reproduction. Vibrio cholerae which causes cholera epidemics, interacts with numerous phages in the environment and in cholera patients. Although CRISPR-Cas systems are usually carried by bacteria and archea, recently V. cholerae specific ICP1 phages were found to host a CRISPR-Cas system that inactivates PICI-like elements (PLE) in V. cholerae. We analyzed a collection of phages and V. cholerae isolated during seasonal cholera epidemics in Bangladesh, to study the distribution, and recent evolution of the phage-encoded CRISPR-Cas system. Five distinct but related phages carrying the CRISPR-Cas system, and possible CRISPR-Cas negative progenitor phages were identified. Furthermore, CRISPR arrays in the phages were found to have evolved by acquisition of new spacers targeting diverse regions of PLEs carried by the V. cholerae strains, enabling the phages to efficiently grow on PLE positive strains. Our results demonstrate a continuing arms-race involving genetic determinants of phage-resistance in V. cholerae, and the phage-encoded CRISPR-Cas system in the co-evolution of V. cholerae and its phages, presumably fostered by their enhanced interactions during seasonal epidemics of cholera.

Indexed as

CRISPR-Cas SystemsBacteriophagesBangladeshBiological CoevolutionCholeraEpidemicsHost Microbial InteractionsVibrio cholerae

Identifiers

PMID29093571
PMCPMC5665941
OpenAlexW2765134053

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.