Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29093164›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2017

The immunopeptidomic landscape of ovarian carcinomas.

Heiko Schuster, Janet K Peper, Hans-Christian Bösmüller, Kevin Röhle, Linus Backert, Tatjana Bilich, Britta Ney, Markus W Löffler, Daniel J Kowalewski, Nico Trautwein and 14 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 120 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
120citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

120 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Drug Discovery Strategies for Kallikrein-Related Peptidases.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

60 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

24 authors.

Heiko SchusterDepartment of Immunology, Institute of Cell Biology, University of Tübingen, 72076 Tübingen, Germany.
Janet K PeperDepartment of Immunology, Institute of Cell Biology, University of Tübingen, 72076 Tübingen, Germany.
Hans-Christian BösmüllerInstitute of Pathology, University Hospital of Tübingen, 72076 Tübingen, Germany.
Kevin RöhleDepartment of Immunology, Institute of Cell Biology, University of Tübingen, 72076 Tübingen, Germany.
Linus BackertDepartment of Immunology, Institute of Cell Biology, University of Tübingen, 72076 Tübingen, Germany.
Tatjana BilichDepartment of Immunology, Institute of Cell Biology, University of Tübingen, 72076 Tübingen, Germany.
Britta NeyInstitute of Pathology, University Hospital of Tübingen, 72076 Tübingen, Germany.
Markus W LöfflerDepartment of Immunology, Institute of Cell Biology, University of Tübingen, 72076 Tübingen, Germany.
Daniel J KowalewskiDepartment of Immunology, Institute of Cell Biology, University of Tübingen, 72076 Tübingen, Germany.
Nico TrautweinDepartment of Immunology, Institute of Cell Biology, University of Tübingen, 72076 Tübingen, Germany.
Armin RabsteynDepartment of Immunology, Institute of Cell Biology, University of Tübingen, 72076 Tübingen, Germany.
Tobias EnglerDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital of Tübingen, 72076 Tübingen, Germany.
Sabine BraunDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital of Tübingen, 72076 Tübingen, Germany.
Sebastian P HaenDepartment of Immunology, Institute of Cell Biology, University of Tübingen, 72076 Tübingen, Germany.
Juliane S WalzDepartment of Immunology, Institute of Cell Biology, University of Tübingen, 72076 Tübingen, Germany.
Barbara Schmid-HorchDepartment of Clinical and Experimental Transfusion Medicine, University Hospital of Tübingen, 72076 Tübingen, Germany.
Sara Y BruckerDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital of Tübingen, 72076 Tübingen, Germany.
Diethelm WallwienerDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital of Tübingen, 72076 Tübingen, Germany.
Oliver KohlbacherApplied Bioinformatics, Center for Bioinformatics and Department of Computer Science, University of Tübingen, 72074 Tübingen, Germany.
Falko FendInstitute of Pathology, University Hospital of Tübingen, 72076 Tübingen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-5496-293X
Hans-Georg RammenseeDepartment of Immunology, Institute of Cell Biology, University of Tübingen, 72076 Tübingen, Germany.
Stefan StevanovićDepartment of Immunology, Institute of Cell Biology, University of Tübingen, 72076 Tübingen, Germany.
Annette StaeblerInstitute of Pathology, University Hospital of Tübingen, 72076 Tübingen, Germany; annette.staebler@med.uni-tuebingen.de.
Philipp WagnerDepartment of Immunology, Institute of Cell Biology, University of Tübingen, 72076 Tübingen, Germany.

Funding

European Research Council 339842
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Immunotherapies, particularly checkpoint inhibitors, have set off a revolution in cancer therapy by releasing the power of the immune system. However, only little is known about the antigens that are essentially presented on cancer cells, capable of exposing them to immune cells. Large-scale HLA ligandome analysis has enabled us to exhaustively characterize the immunopeptidomic landscape of epithelial ovarian cancers (EOCs). Additional comparative profiling with the immunopeptidome of a variety of benign sources has unveiled a multitude of ovarian cancer antigens (MUC16, MSLN, LGALS1, IDO1, KLK10) to be presented by HLA class I and class II molecules exclusively on ovarian cancer cells. Most strikingly, ligands derived from mucin 16 and mesothelin, a molecular axis of prognostic importance in EOC, are prominent in a majority of patients. Differential gene-expression analysis has allowed us to confirm the relevance of these targets for EOC and further provided important insights into the relationship between gene transcript levels and HLA ligand presentation.

Indexed as

Antigen PresentationCA-125 AntigenCarcinoma, Ovarian EpithelialFemaleGalectin 1Gene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticGPI-Linked ProteinsHistocompatibility Antigens Class IHistocompatibility Antigens Class IIHLA-DR AntigensHumansImmunotherapyIndoleamine-Pyrrole 2,3,-DioxygenaseKallikreinsLigandsMembrane GlycoproteinsCA-125 AntigenGalectin 1GPI-Linked ProteinsHistocompatibility Antigens Class IHistocompatibility Antigens Class IIHLA-DR AntigensIDO1 protein, humanIndoleamine-Pyrrole 2,3,-DioxygenaseKallikreinsKLK10 protein, humanLGALS1 protein, humanLigandsMembrane GlycoproteinsMembrane ProteinsMesothelinMSLN protein, humanMUC16 protein, humanimmunopeptidomeimmunotherapymesothelinmucin 16ovarian cancer

Identifiers

PMID29093164
PMCPMC5699044

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.