Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29093130›Full record

ReviewJournal of the Royal Society, Interface2017

Scale invariance in natural and artificial collective systems: a review.

Yara Khaluf, Eliseo Ferrante, Pieter Simoens, Cristián Huepe

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of the Royal Society, Interface, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. The fractal brain: scale-invariance in structure and dynamics.Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991) · 2023
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Hybrid foraging in patchy environments using spatial memory.Journal of the Royal Society, Interface · 2020
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Yara KhalufGhent University-imec, IDLab-INTEC, Technologiepark 15, 9052 Gent, Belgium yara.khaluf@ugent.be.ORCID 0000-0002-5590-9321
Eliseo FerranteKU Leuven, Laboratory of Socioecology and Social Evolution, Naamsestraat 59, 3000 Leuven, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0002-2213-8356
Pieter SimoensGhent University-imec, IDLab-INTEC, Technologiepark 15, 9052 Gent, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0002-9569-9373
Cristián HuepeCHuepe Labs, 814 W 19th Street 1F, Chicago, IL 60608, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Self-organized collective coordinated behaviour is an impressive phenomenon, observed in a variety of natural and artificial systems, in which coherent global structures or dynamics emerge from local interactions between individual parts. If the degree of collective integration of a system does not depend on size, its level of robustness and adaptivity is typically increased and we refer to it as scale-invariant. In this review, we first identify three main types of self-organized scale-invariant systems: scale-invariant spatial structures, scale-invariant topologies and scale-invariant dynamics. We then provide examples of scale invariance from different domains in science, describe their origins and main features and discuss potential challenges and approaches for designing and engineering artificial systems with scale-invariant properties.

Indexed as

Models, Theoreticalcollective behaviourdistributed systems and controlscale-free networksscale-invariant dynamics

Identifiers

PMID29093130
PMCPMC5721168

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.