Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29092902›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2017

Dose-response relationship between cigarette smoking and site-specific cancer risk: protocol for a systematic review with an original design combining umbrella and traditional reviews.

Alessandra Lugo, Cristina Bosetti, Giulia Peveri, Matteo Rota, Vincenzo Bagnardi, Silvano Gallus

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Association between second-hand smoke exposure and lung cancer risk in never-smokers: a systematic review and meta-analysis.European respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society · 2024
    Pooled it
  5. Dose-response association between cigarette smoking and gastric cancer risk: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Gastric cancer : official journal of the International Gastric Cancer Association and the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association · 2024
    Pooled it
  6. The role of smoking in COVID-19 progression: a comprehensive meta-analysis.European respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society · 2023
    Pooled it
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Alessandra LugoDepartment of Environmental Health Sciences, IRCCS - Istituto di Ricerche Farmacologiche 'Mario Negri', Milan, Italy.
Cristina BosettiDepartment of Oncology, IRCCS - Istituto di Ricerche Farmacologiche 'Mario Negri', Milan, Italy.
Giulia PeveriDepartment of Environmental Health Sciences, IRCCS - Istituto di Ricerche Farmacologiche 'Mario Negri', Milan, Italy.
Matteo RotaDepartment of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy.
Vincenzo BagnardiDepartment of Statistics and Quantitative Methods, Università degli Studi di Milano-Bicocca, Milan, Italy.
Silvano GallusDepartment of Environmental Health Sciences, IRCCS - Istituto di Ricerche Farmacologiche 'Mario Negri', Milan, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionOnly a limited number of meta-analyses providing risk curve functions of dose-response relationships between various smoking-related variables and cancer-specific risk are available. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: To identify all relevant original publications on the issue, we will conduct a series of comprehensive systematic reviews based on three subsequent literature searches: (1) an umbrella review, to identify meta-analyses, pooled analyses and systematic reviews published before 28 April 2017 on the association between cigarette smoking and the risk of 28 (namely all) malignant neoplasms; (2) for each cancer site, an updated review of original publications on the association between cigarette smoking and cancer risk, starting from the last available comprehensive review identified through the umbrella review; and (3) a review of all original articles on the association between cigarette smoking and site-specific cancer risk included in the publications identified through the umbrella review and the updated reviews. The primary outcomes of interest will be (1) the excess incidence/mortality of various cancers for smokers compared with never smokers; and (2) the dose-response curves describing the association between smoking intensity, duration and time since stopping and incidence/mortality for various cancers. For each cancer site, we will perform a meta-analysis by pooling study-specific estimates for smoking status. We will also estimate the dose-response curves for other smoking-related variables through random-effects meta-regression models based on a non-linear dose-response relationship framework. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethics approval is not required for this study. Main results will be published in peer-reviewed journals and will also be included in a publicly available website. We will provide therefore the most complete and updated estimates on the association between various measures of cigarette smoking and site-specific cancer risk. This will allow us to obtain precise estimates on the cancer burden attributable to cigarette smoking. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: This protocol was registered in the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (CRD42017063991).

Indexed as

Cigarette SmokingHumansNeoplasmsResearch DesignRisk FactorsSystematic Reviews as TopicTobacco Productscancercigarette smokingdose-response relationshipmeta-analysisrisksystematic review

Identifiers

PMID29092902
PMCPMC5695313

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.