ArticleThe Journal of the Acoustical Society of America2017
Localization of complex sounds is modulated by behavioral relevance and sound category.
Article in The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Emotional sounds in space: asymmetrical representation within early-stage auditory areas.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2023Article
- Situational Awareness: The Effect of Stimulus Type and Hearing Protection on Sound Localization.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- Cortical mechanisms of spatial hearing.Nature reviews. Neuroscience · 2019Review
- Ecological cocktail party listening reveals the utility of extended high-frequency hearing.Hearing research · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Meaningful sounds represent the majority of sounds that humans hear and process in everyday life. Yet studies of human sound localization mainly use artificial stimuli such as clicks, pure tones, and noise bursts. The present study investigated the influence of behavioral relevance, sound category, and acoustic properties on the localization of complex, meaningful sounds in the horizontal plane. Participants localized vocalizations and traffic sounds with two levels of behavioral relevance (low and high) within each category, as well as amplitude-modulated tones. Results showed a small but significant effect of behavioral relevance: localization acuity was higher for complex sounds with a high level of behavioral relevance at several target locations. The data also showed category-specific effects: localization biases were lower, and localization precision higher, for vocalizations than for traffic sounds in central space. Several acoustic parameters influenced sound localization performance as well. Correcting localization responses for front-back reversals reduced the overall variability across sounds, but behavioral relevance and sound category still had a modulatory effect on sound localization performance in central auditory space. The results thus demonstrate that spatial hearing performance for complex sounds is influenced not only by acoustic characteristics, but also by sound category and behavioral relevance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.