Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29092073›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA2018

Reproducible Bioconductor workflows using browser-based interactive notebooks and containers.

Reem Almugbel, Ling-Hong Hung, Jiaming Hu, Abeer Almutairy, Nicole Ortogero, Yashaswi Tamta, Ka Yee Yeung

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Does health informatics have a replication crisis?Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2018
    Article
  11. Biomedical informatics and data science: evolving fields with significant overlap.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2018
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Reem AlmugbelInstitute of Technology, University of Washington, Tacoma, WA, USA.
Ling-Hong HungInstitute of Technology, University of Washington, Tacoma, WA, USA.
Jiaming HuInstitute of Technology, University of Washington, Tacoma, WA, USA.
Abeer AlmutairyInstitute of Technology, University of Washington, Tacoma, WA, USA.
Nicole OrtogeroDepartment of Clinical Investigation, Madigan Army Medical Center, Tacoma, WA, USA.
Yashaswi TamtaInstitute of Technology, University of Washington, Tacoma, WA, USA.
Ka Yee YeungInstitute of Technology, University of Washington, Tacoma, WA, USA.

Funding

Data Coordination and Integration Center for LINCS-BD2KU54HL127624 · NHLBI · ICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUNT SINAI · PI MA'AYAN, AVI, SCHURER, STEPHAN C · 2014 to 2019
$23.5M
NHLBI NIH HHS U54 HL127624
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: Bioinformatics publications typically include complex software workflows that are difficult to describe in a manuscript. We describe and demonstrate the use of interactive software notebooks to document and distribute bioinformatics research. We provide a user-friendly tool, BiocImageBuilder, that allows users to easily distribute their bioinformatics protocols through interactive notebooks uploaded to either a GitHub repository or a private server. Materials and methods: We present four different interactive Jupyter notebooks using R and Bioconductor workflows to infer differential gene expression, analyze cross-platform datasets, process RNA-seq data and KinomeScan data. These interactive notebooks are available on GitHub. The analytical results can be viewed in a browser. Most importantly, the software contents can be executed and modified. This is accomplished using Binder, which runs the notebook inside software containers, thus avoiding the need to install any software and ensuring reproducibility. All the notebooks were produced using custom files generated by BiocImageBuilder. Results: BiocImageBuilder facilitates the publication of workflows with a point-and-click user interface. We demonstrate that interactive notebooks can be used to disseminate a wide range of bioinformatics analyses. The use of software containers to mirror the original software environment ensures reproducibility of results. Parameters and code can be dynamically modified, allowing for robust verification of published results and encouraging rapid adoption of new methods. Conclusion: Given the increasing complexity of bioinformatics workflows, we anticipate that these interactive software notebooks will become as necessary for documenting software methods as traditional laboratory notebooks have been for documenting bench protocols, and as ubiquitous.

Indexed as

Computational BiologySoftwareWorkflowBiomedical ResearchReproducibility of ResultsSoftware Designautomatedbioconductor workflowscontainersdata sciencereproducibility

Identifiers

PMID29092073
PMCPMC6381817

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.