ArticleJournal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA2018
Reproducible Bioconductor workflows using browser-based interactive notebooks and containers.
Article in Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Facilitating Harmonization of Variables in Framingham, MESA, ARIC, and REGARDS Studies Through a Metadata Repository.Circulation. Cardiovascular quality and outcomes · 2023Article
- Streamlining statistical reproducibility: NHLBI ORCHID clinical trial results reproduction.JAMIA open · 2022Review
- Article
- Implementing the FAIR Data Principles in precision oncology: review of supporting initiatives.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2020Review
- ML-MEDIC: A Preliminary Study of an Interactive Visual Analysis Tool Facilitating Clinical Applications of Machine Learning for Precision Medicine.Applied sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020Article
- Vertical and horizontal integration of multi-omics data with miodin.BMC bioinformatics · 2019Article
- Building Containerized Workflows Using the BioDepot-Workflow-Builder.Cell systems · 2019Article
- NanoDJ: a Dockerized Jupyter notebook for interactive Oxford Nanopore MinION sequence manipulation and genome assembly.BMC bioinformatics · 2019Article
- Reproducible bioinformatics project: a community for reproducible bioinformatics analysis pipelines.BMC bioinformatics · 2018Article
- Does health informatics have a replication crisis?Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2018Article
- Biomedical informatics and data science: evolving fields with significant overlap.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Objective: Bioinformatics publications typically include complex software workflows that are difficult to describe in a manuscript. We describe and demonstrate the use of interactive software notebooks to document and distribute bioinformatics research. We provide a user-friendly tool, BiocImageBuilder, that allows users to easily distribute their bioinformatics protocols through interactive notebooks uploaded to either a GitHub repository or a private server. Materials and methods: We present four different interactive Jupyter notebooks using R and Bioconductor workflows to infer differential gene expression, analyze cross-platform datasets, process RNA-seq data and KinomeScan data. These interactive notebooks are available on GitHub. The analytical results can be viewed in a browser. Most importantly, the software contents can be executed and modified. This is accomplished using Binder, which runs the notebook inside software containers, thus avoiding the need to install any software and ensuring reproducibility. All the notebooks were produced using custom files generated by BiocImageBuilder. Results: BiocImageBuilder facilitates the publication of workflows with a point-and-click user interface. We demonstrate that interactive notebooks can be used to disseminate a wide range of bioinformatics analyses. The use of software containers to mirror the original software environment ensures reproducibility of results. Parameters and code can be dynamically modified, allowing for robust verification of published results and encouraging rapid adoption of new methods. Conclusion: Given the increasing complexity of bioinformatics workflows, we anticipate that these interactive software notebooks will become as necessary for documenting software methods as traditional laboratory notebooks have been for documenting bench protocols, and as ubiquitous.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.