Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29092027›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of orthodontics2018

The effects of alveolar decortications on orthodontic tooth movement and bone remodelling in rats.

Eliane H Dutra, Ahmad Ahmida, Alexandro Lima, Sydney Schneider, Ravindra Nanda, Sumit Yadav

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of orthodontics, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
4.4field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Impact of piezocision on orthodontic tooth movement.Korean journal of orthodontics · 2021
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Eliane H DutraDivision of Orthodontics, University of Connecticut Health Center, Farmington, CT, USA.
Ahmad AhmidaDivision of Orthodontics, University of Connecticut Health Center, Farmington, CT, USA.
Alexandro LimaDivision of Orthodontics, University of Connecticut Health Center, Farmington, CT, USA.
Sydney SchneiderSchool of Dental Medicine, University of Connecticut Health Center, Farmington, CT, USA.
Ravindra NandaDivision of Orthodontics, University of Connecticut Health Center, Farmington, CT, USA.
Sumit YadavDivision of Orthodontics, University of Connecticut Health Center, Farmington, CT, USA.
UConn Health · US

Funding

Mechanism of BMP2 regulation of Mandibular Condylar Cartilage GrowthK08DE025914 · NIDCR · UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT SCH OF MED/DNT · PI YADAV, SUMIT · 2017 to 2021
$947k
NIDCR NIH HHS K08 DE025914
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: Alveolar decortication (AD) is a minimally invasive procedure that can be performed in the orthodontic office as an intervention to accelerate tooth movement. There is a gap in the literature evaluating the earlier and delayed responses after AD using lighter orthodontic forces in a rat model. Therefore, the aim of this study was to determine the effects of AD in the amount of orthodontic tooth movement and on alveolar bone remodelling in a rodent model, after 7 or 14 days. Materials and methods: A total of 32 15-week-old male Wistar rats were used in four treatment groups: (1) orthodontic spring only (7 days), (2) orthodontic spring only + AD (7 days), (3) orthodontic spring only (14 days), and (4) orthodontic spring only + AD (14 days). A closed coil nickel-titanium spring delivering 8-10 g of force was used to move the molar mesially. Alveolar decortication was done using a high speed, quarter round bur adjacent to the left first maxillary molar, on the palatal alveolar bone. At each endpoint, rats were sacrificed and microfocus computed tomography and histological analysis were performed. Results: The spring + AD group presented with a significant increase in the rate of tooth movement when compared with spring only group, 7 and 14 days after the beginning of the experiments. In addition, the spring + AD group had a significant decrease in bone volume and tissue density and a significant increase in the trabecular spacing and the number of osteoclasts at 7 and 14 days. Furthermore, a fibrous tissue was found to replace the alveolar bone in the spring + AD group at day 14. Conclusion: Alveolar decortications enhanced bone remodelling around the tooth movement region and could be used as an adjunct surgical procedure to accelerate the rate of tooth movement.

Indexed as

Alveolar ProcessAnimalsBone RemodelingDisease Models, AnimalMaleMinimally Invasive Surgical ProceduresMolarNickelOrthodontic AppliancesOsteoclastsRats, WistarTitaniumTooth Movement TechniquesNickelTitaniumtitanium nickelide

Identifiers

PMID29092027
PMCPMC6279100
OpenAlexW2765657977

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.