Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29092025›Full record

ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2018

Simulating the dynamics of targeted capture sequencing with CapSim.

Minh Duc Cao, Devika Ganesamoorthy, Chenxi Zhou, Lachlan J M Coin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. A broad survey of DNA sequence data simulation tools.Briefings in functional genomics · 2020
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Minh Duc CaoInstitute for Molecular Bioscience, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, St Lucia, QLD 4072, Australia.
Devika GanesamoorthyInstitute for Molecular Bioscience, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, St Lucia, QLD 4072, Australia.
Chenxi ZhouInstitute for Molecular Bioscience, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, St Lucia, QLD 4072, Australia.
Lachlan J M CoinInstitute for Molecular Bioscience, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, St Lucia, QLD 4072, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Motivation: Targeted sequencing using capture probes has become increasingly popular in clinical applications due to its scalability and cost-effectiveness. The approach also allows for higher sequencing coverage of the targeted regions resulting in better analysis statistical power. However, because of the dynamics of the hybridization process, it is difficult to evaluate the efficiency of the probe design prior to the experiments which are time consuming and costly. Results: We developed CapSim, a software package for simulation of targeted sequencing. Given a genome sequence and a set of probes, CapSim simulates the fragmentation, the dynamics of probe hybridization and the sequencing of the captured fragments on Illumina and PacBio sequencing platforms. The simulated data can be used for evaluating the performance of the analysis pipeline, as well as the efficiency of the probe design. Parameters of the various stages in the sequencing process can also be evaluated in order to optimize the experiments. Availability and implementation: CapSim is publicly available under BSD license at https://github.com/Devika1/capsim. Contact: l.coin@imb.uq.edu.au. Supplementary information: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.

Indexed as

GenomicsHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingSequence Analysis, DNASoftware

Identifiers

PMID29092025
PMCPMC6192212

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.