ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2018
Quantifying biological samples using Linear Poisson Independent Component Analysis for MALDI-ToF mass spectra.
Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- De-MSI: A Deep Learning-Based Data Denoising Method to Enhance Mass Spectrometry Imaging by Leveraging the Chemical Prior Knowledge.Analytical chemistry · 2025Article
- Adipose tissue composition determines its computed tomography radiodensity.European radiology · 2024Article
- Mass Spectrometry Imaging for Spatial Chemical Profiling of Vegetative Parts of Plants.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
- Habitat Imaging of Tumors Enables High Confidence Sub-Regional Assessment of Response to Therapy.Cancers · 2022Article
- A mathematical comparison of non-negative matrix factorization related methods with practical implications for the analysis of mass spectrometry imaging data.Rapid communications in mass spectrometry : RCM · 2021Article
- Quantitative Mass Spectrometry Imaging of Biological Systems.Annual review of physical chemistry · 2021Review
- A reformulation of pLSA for uncertainty estimation and hypothesis testing in bio-imaging.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2020Article
- A new method for the high-precision assessment of tumor changes in response to treatment.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Motivation: Matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionisation time-of-flight mass spectrometry (MALDI) facilitates the analysis of large organic molecules. However, the complexity of biological samples and MALDI data acquisition leads to high levels of variation, making reliable quantification of samples difficult. We present a new analysis approach that we believe is well-suited to the properties of MALDI mass spectra, based upon an Independent Component Analysis derived for Poisson sampled data. Simple analyses have been limited to studying small numbers of mass peaks, via peak ratios, which is known to be inefficient. Conventional PCA and ICA methods have also been applied, which extract correlations between any number of peaks, but we argue makes inappropriate assumptions regarding data noise, i.e. uniform and Gaussian. Results: We provide evidence that the Gaussian assumption is incorrect, motivating the need for our Poisson approach. The method is demonstrated by making proportion measurements from lipid-rich binary mixtures of lamb brain and liver, and also goat and cow milk. These allow our measurements and error predictions to be compared to ground truth. Availability and implementation: Software is available via the open source image analysis system TINA Vision, www.tina-vision.net. Contact: paul.tar@manchester.ac.uk. Supplementary information: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.