Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29091939›Full record

ArticlePloS one2017

Evaluation of the efficacy of dasatinib, a Src/Abl inhibitor, in colorectal cancer cell lines and explant mouse model.

Aaron J Scott, Eun-Kee Song, Stacey Bagby, Alicia Purkey, Martin McCarter, Csaba Gajdos, Kevin S Quackenbush, Benjamin Cross, Todd M Pitts, Aik Choon Tan and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Aaron J ScottDivision of Medical Oncology, Banner University of Arizona Cancer Center, Tucson, AZ, United States of America.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0301-3072
Eun-Kee SongChonbuk National University Medical School, Jeonju, South Korea.
Stacey BagbyDivision of Medical Oncology, University of Colorado Denver Anschutz Medical Campus and University of Colorado Cancer Center, Aurora, CO, United States of America.
Alicia PurkeyDivision of Medical Oncology, University of Colorado Denver Anschutz Medical Campus and University of Colorado Cancer Center, Aurora, CO, United States of America.
Martin McCarterDepartment of Surgery, University of Colorado Denver Anschutz Medical Campus and University of Colorado Cancer Center, Aurora, CO, United States of America.
Csaba GajdosDepartment of Surgery, University of Colorado Denver Anschutz Medical Campus and University of Colorado Cancer Center, Aurora, CO, United States of America.
Kevin S QuackenbushDivision of Medical Oncology, University of Colorado Denver Anschutz Medical Campus and University of Colorado Cancer Center, Aurora, CO, United States of America.
Benjamin CrossDivision of Medical Oncology, University of Colorado Denver Anschutz Medical Campus and University of Colorado Cancer Center, Aurora, CO, United States of America.
Todd M PittsDivision of Medical Oncology, University of Colorado Denver Anschutz Medical Campus and University of Colorado Cancer Center, Aurora, CO, United States of America.
Aik Choon TanDivision of Medical Oncology, University of Colorado Denver Anschutz Medical Campus and University of Colorado Cancer Center, Aurora, CO, United States of America.
S Gail EckhardtDivision of Medical Oncology, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, United States of America.
Hubert FentonDepartment of Pathology, University of Colorado Denver Anschutz Medical Campus and University of Colorado Cancer Center, Aurora, CO, United States of America.
John ArcaroliDivision of Medical Oncology, University of Colorado Denver Anschutz Medical Campus and University of Colorado Cancer Center, Aurora, CO, United States of America.
Wells A MessersmithDivision of Medical Oncology, University of Colorado Denver Anschutz Medical Campus and University of Colorado Cancer Center, Aurora, CO, United States of America.

Funding

University of Colorado Cancer Center Support Grant - Lung Cancer Patient-Derived Xenografts with Autologous Human Immune SystemsP30CA046934 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO DENVER · PI James V Degregori · 1988 to 2026
$117.0M
Biomarker-Driven Src Inhibitor Studies in Colorectal Cancer PatientsR01CA152303 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO DENVER · PI MESSERSMITH, WELLS A. · 2010 to 2014
$1.5M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA046934NCI NIH HHS R01 CA152303
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDysregulation of the Src pathway has been shown to be important at various stages of cancer. Dasatinib is a potent Src/Abl inhibitor and has demonstrated to have anti-proliferative and anti-invasive activity in many preclinical models. The objective of this study was to determine the anti-tumor activity of dasatinib using in vitro and in vivo preclinical colorectal (CRC) models.

methodsCRC cell lines and patient-derived tumor explant (PDX) models were used to investigate the efficacy of dasatinib. We treated 50 CRC cell lines with dasatinib for 72 hours and proliferation was assayed by a sulforhodamine B (SRB) assay; an IC50 ≤ 0.08 μmol/L was considered sensitive. We treated 17 patient-derived CRC explants with dasatinib (50 mg/kg/day, administered once-daily) for 28 days to determine in vivo efficacy. Tumor growth inhibition (TGI) ≥ 50% was considered sensitive.

resultsWe found that 8 out of 50 CRC cell lines reached an IC50 ≤ 0.08 μmol/L with dasatinib treatment. In addition, of 17 CRC explants grown in the xenograft mouse model, 2 showed sensitivity to dasatinib. The anti-tumor effects observed in this study were a result of G1 cell cycle arrest as the dasatinib sensitive CRC cell lines exhibited G1 inhibition. Moreover, those CRC cell lines that were responsive (0.08 μmol/L) to treatment demonstrated a significant baseline increase in Src and FAK gene expression.

conclusionDasatinib demonstrated significant anti-proliferative activity in a subset of CRC cell lines in vitro, especially in those with increased Src expression at baseline, but only showed modest efficacy in CRC explants. Dasatinib is currently being studied in combination with chemotherapy in patients with advanced CRC, as its use as a single agent appears limited.

Indexed as

AnimalsAntineoplastic AgentsApoptosisCell CycleCell Line, TumorDasatinibHumansMiceOncogene Proteins v-ablProtein Kinase Inhibitorssrc-Family KinasesXenograft Model Antitumor AssaysAntineoplastic AgentsDasatinibOncogene Proteins v-ablProtein Kinase Inhibitorssrc-Family Kinases

Identifiers

PMID29091939
PMCPMC5665512

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.