Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29091801›Full record

ArticleWater research2018

Biochar and activated carbon act as promising amendments for promoting the microbial debromination of tetrabromobisphenol A.

Emilie Lefèvre, Nathan Bossa, Courtney M Gardner, Gretchen E Gehrke, Ellen M Cooper, Heather M Stapleton, Heileen Hsu-Kim, Claudia K Gunsch

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Water research, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 59 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Emilie LefèvreDepartment of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Duke University, Hudson Hall, Durham, NC 27708, USA. Electronic address: emilie.lefevre@duke.edu.
Nathan BossaDepartment of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Duke University, Hudson Hall, Durham, NC 27708, USA. Electronic address: nathan.bossa@duke.edu.
Courtney M GardnerDepartment of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Duke University, Hudson Hall, Durham, NC 27708, USA. Electronic address: courtney.gardner@duke.edu.
Gretchen E GehrkeDepartment of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Duke University, Hudson Hall, Durham, NC 27708, USA. Electronic address: gretchen@publiclab.com.
Ellen M CooperNicholas School of the Environment, Duke University, 9 Circuit Drive, Durham, NC 27710, USA. Electronic address: ellenc@duke.edu.
Heather M StapletonNicholas School of the Environment, Duke University, 9 Circuit Drive, Durham, NC 27710, USA. Electronic address: heather.stapleton@duke.edu.
Heileen Hsu-KimDepartment of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Duke University, Hudson Hall, Durham, NC 27708, USA. Electronic address: hsukim@duke.edul.
Claudia K GunschDepartment of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Duke University, Hudson Hall, Durham, NC 27708, USA. Electronic address: ckgunsch@duke.edu.
Duke University · US

Funding

Zebrafish as a Detector of Organophosphate ExposureP42ES010356 · NIEHS · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI EDWARD D LEVIN · 2000 to 2026
$56.2M
NIEHS NIH HHS P42 ES010356
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The increasing occurrence of tetrabromobisphenol A (TBBPA) in the environment is raising questions about its potential environmental health impacts as it has been shown to cause various deleterious effects in humans. The fact that the highest concentrations of TBBPA have been reported in wastewater sludge is concerning as effluent discharge and biosolids land application are likely a route by which TBBPA can be further disbursed to the environment. Our objectives in this study were to evaluate the effect of biochar (BC) and activated carbon (AC) in promoting the biodegradation of TBBPA, and characterize the response of anaerobic sludge microbial communities following amendments. Both carbonaceous amendments were found to promote the reductive debromination of TBBPA. Nearly complete transformation of TBBPA to BPA was observed in the amended reactors ∼20 days earlier than in the control reactors. In particular, the transformation of diBBPA to monoBBPA, which appears to be the rate-limiting step, was accelerated in the presence of either amendment. Overall, microbial taxa responding to the amendments, i.e., 'sensitive responders', represented a small proportion of the community (i.e., 7.2%), and responded positively. However, although both amendments had a similar effect on TBBPA degradation, the taxonomic profile of the sensitive responders differed greatly from one amendment to the other. BC had a taxonomically broader and slightly more pronounced effect than AC. This work suggests that BC and AC show great potential to promote the biodegradation of TBBPA in anaerobic sludge, and their integration into wastewater treatment processes may be helpful for removing TBBPA and possibly other emerging hydrophobic contaminants.

Indexed as

Biodegradation, EnvironmentalCharcoalPolybrominated BiphenylsSewageWastewaterWater PurificationbiocharCharcoalPolybrominated BiphenylsSewagetetrabromobisphenol AWastewaterActivated carbonBiocharFlame-retardantsReductive dehalogenationTBBPAWastewater treatment

Identifiers

PMID29091801
PMCPMC5796758
OpenAlexW2760108589

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.