Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29091713›Full record

ArticlePLoS neglected tropical diseases2017

After the epidemic: Zika virus projections for Latin America and the Caribbean.

Felipe J Colón-González, Carlos A Peres, Christine Steiner São Bernardo, Paul R Hunter, Iain R Lake

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS neglected tropical diseases, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Observational
  14. Modeling the association betweenCurrent research in parasitology & vector-borne diseases · 2021
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Felipe J Colón-GonzálezSchool of Environmental Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norwich, Norfolk, United Kingdom.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9671-3405
Carlos A PeresSchool of Environmental Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norwich, Norfolk, United Kingdom.
Christine Steiner São BernardoUniversidade do Estado de Mato Grosso, Rua São Pedro s/n, Cavalhada, Cáceres, Mato Grosso, Brazil.
Paul R HunterNorwich Medical School, University of East Anglia, Norwich, Norfolk, United Kingdom.
Iain R LakeSchool of Environmental Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norwich, Norfolk, United Kingdom.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundZika is one of the most challenging emergent vector-borne diseases, yet its future public health impact remains unclear. Zika was of little public health concern until recent reports of its association with congenital syndromes. By 3 August 2017 ∼217,000 Zika cases and ∼3,400 cases of associated congenital syndrome were reported in Latin America and the Caribbean. Some modelling exercises suggest that Zika virus infection could become endemic in agreement with recent declarations from the The World Health Organisation. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL

findingsWe produced high-resolution spatially-explicit projections of Zika cases, associated congenital syndromes and monetary costs for Latin America and the Caribbean now that the epidemic phase of the disease appears to be over. In contrast to previous studies which have adopted a modelling approach to map Zika potential, we project case numbers using a statistical approach based upon reported dengue case data as a Zika surrogate. Our results indicate that ∼12.3 (0.7-162.3) million Zika cases could be expected across Latin America and the Caribbean every year, leading to ∼64.4 (0.2-5159.3) thousand cases of Guillain-Barré syndrome and ∼4.7 (0.0-116.3) thousand cases of microcephaly. The economic burden of these neurological sequelae are estimated to be USD ∼2.3 (USD 0-159.3) billion per annum. CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: Zika is likely to have significant public health consequences across Latin America and the Caribbean in years to come. Our projections inform regional and federal health authorities, offering an opportunity to adapt to this public health challenge.

Indexed as

EpidemicsAedesAnimalsCaribbean RegionDisease OutbreaksEndemic DiseasesGlobal HealthGuillain-Barre SyndromeHumansLatin AmericaMicrocephalyPublic HealthWorld Health OrganizationZika VirusZika Virus Infection

Identifiers

PMID29091713
PMCPMC5683651

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.