Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29091202›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy2017

PointFinder: a novel web tool for WGS-based detection of antimicrobial resistance associated with chromosomal point mutations in bacterial pathogens.

Ea Zankari, Rosa Allesøe, Katrine G Joensen, Lina M Cavaco, Ole Lund, Frank M Aarestrup

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 537 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
537citing papers in PubMed
7.6field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

537 citing papers in PubMed, 779 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. In-host adaptation ofMicrobiology spectrum · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Draft genome sequences of eight biofilm-formingMicrobiology resource announcements · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Feline Endocarditis Caused by Carbapenem-ResistantAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Seasonal and spatial dynamics ofOne health (Amsterdam, Netherlands) · 2026
    Article
  20. Emerging Dissemination of blaMicrobiologyOpen · 2026
    Article

477 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Ea ZankariNational Food Institute, Technical University of Denmark, 2800 Kgs Lyngby, Denmark.
Rosa AllesøeCenter for Biological Sequence Analysis, Department of Systems Biology, Technical University of Denmark, 2800 Kgs Lyngby, Denmark.
Katrine G JoensenDepartment of Microbiology and Infection Control, Statens Serum Institut, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Lina M CavacoNational Food Institute, Technical University of Denmark, 2800 Kgs Lyngby, Denmark.
Ole LundCenter for Biological Sequence Analysis, Department of Systems Biology, Technical University of Denmark, 2800 Kgs Lyngby, Denmark.
Frank M AarestrupNational Food Institute, Technical University of Denmark, 2800 Kgs Lyngby, Denmark.
Technical University of Denmark · DKStatens Serum Institut · DK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Antibiotic resistance is a major health problem, as drugs that were once highly effective no longer cure bacterial infections. WGS has previously been shown to be an alternative method for detecting horizontally acquired antimicrobial resistance genes. However, suitable bioinformatics methods that can provide easily interpretable, accurate and fast results for antimicrobial resistance associated with chromosomal point mutations are still lacking. Methods: Phenotypic antimicrobial susceptibility tests were performed on 150 isolates covering three different bacterial species: Salmonella enterica, Escherichia coli and Campylobacter jejuni. The web-server ResFinder-2.1 was used to identify acquired antimicrobial resistance genes and two methods, the novel PointFinder (using BLAST) and an in-house method (mapping of raw WGS reads), were used to identify chromosomal point mutations. Results were compared with phenotypic antimicrobial susceptibility testing results. Results: A total of 685 different phenotypic tests associated with chromosomal resistance to quinolones, polymyxin, rifampicin, macrolides and tetracyclines resulted in 98.4% concordance. Eleven cases of disagreement between tested and predicted susceptibility were observed: two C. jejuni isolates with phenotypic fluoroquinolone resistance and two with phenotypic erythromycin resistance and five colistin-susceptible E. coli isolates with a detected pmrB V161G mutation when assembled with Velvet, but not when using SPAdes or when mapping the reads. Conclusions: PointFinder proved, with high concordance between phenotypic and predicted antimicrobial susceptibility, to be a user-friendly web tool for detection of chromosomal point mutations associated with antimicrobial resistance.

Indexed as

Genome, BacterialPoint MutationSoftwareAnti-Bacterial AgentsCampylobacter jejuniChromosomes, BacterialDrug Resistance, BacterialEnterobacteriaceaeErythromycinEscherichia coliInternetMacrolidesMicrobial Sensitivity TestsPhenotypeQuinolonesSalmonella entericaAnti-Bacterial AgentsErythromycinMacrolidesQuinolonesTetracyclines

Identifiers

PMID29091202
PMCPMC5890747
OpenAlexW2739323458

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.