Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29090967›Full record

ArticleJournal of attention disorders2018

The Qualitative Interview Study of Persistent and Nonpersistent Substance Use in the MTA: Sample Characteristics, Frequent Use, and Reasons for Use.

James M Swanson, Timothy Wigal, Peter S Jensen, John T Mitchell, Thomas S Weisner, Desiree Murray, L Eugene Arnold, Lily Hechtman, Brooke S G Molina, Elizabeth B Owens and 6 more

Open access · greenAbstract readComparative Study
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of attention disorders, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 11 institutions in 2 countries.

James M Swanson1 University of California, Irvine, USA.
Timothy Wigal2 AVIDA, Newport Beach, CA, USA.
Peter S Jensen3 REACH Institute, New York, NY, USA.
John T Mitchell4 Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA.
Thomas S Weisner5 University of California, Los Angeles, USA.
Desiree Murray6 The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, USA.
L Eugene Arnold7 The Ohio State University, Columbus, USA.
Lily Hechtman8 McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Québec, Canada.
Brooke S G Molina9 University of Pittsburg School of Medicine, PA, USA.
Elizabeth B Owens10 University of California, Berkeley, USA.
Stephen P Hinshaw10 University of California, Berkeley, USA.
Katherine Belendiuk11 Genentech, South San Francisco, CA, USA.
Andrea Howard12 Carleton University, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Sharon B Wigal2 AVIDA, Newport Beach, CA, USA.
Page Sorensen13 University of California, San Francisco, USA.
Annamarie Stehli1 University of California, Irvine, USA.
University of California, Berkeley · USUniversity of California, Irvine · USCarleton University · CADuke Medical Center · USMcGill University Health Centre · CAPittsburg State University · USRealistic Education in Action Coalition to Foster Health · USThe Ohio State University · USUniversity of California, Los Angeles · USUniversity of California, San Francisco · USUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · US

Funding

Pathways to adult substance use and abuse from childhood ADHD in the MTAR01DA039881 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI MOLINA, BROOKE S.G. · 2015 to 2018
$1.1M
Emotion Dysregulation, ADHD, and SmokingK23DA032577 · NIDA · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI MITCHELL, JOHN T · 2012 to 2015
$566k
PHARMACOLOGIC AND PSYCHOSOCIAL INTERVENTIONS FOR ADHDU01MH050461 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA BERKELEY · PI HINSHAW, STEPHEN P · 1992 to 2000
$17k
MULTISITE MULTIMODALITY TREATMENT STUDY OF ADHD/ADDU01MH050440 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA IRVINE · PI SWANSON, JAMES M · 1992 to 2000
$17k
PHARMACOLOGICAL AND PSYCHOSOCIAL TREATMENT FOR ADHDU01MH050467 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI PELHAM, WILLIAM E · 1992 to 2000
$17k
FOLLOW-UP OF THE MULTIMODAL TREATMENT STUDY OF CHILDREN WITH ATTENTION-278012012N01MH012012 · NIMH · DUKE UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · 2002 to 2004
–
FOLLOW-UP OF THE MULTIMODAL TREATMENT STUDY OF CHILDREN WITH ATTENTION-278012011N01MH012011 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, IRVI · PI SWANSON, JAMES · 2002 to 2006
–
FOLLOW UP OF THE MULTIMODAL TREATMETN STUDY OF CHILDREN WITH ATTENTION-278012010N01MH012010 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH · PI SG MOLINA, BROOKE · 2002 to 2006
–
FOLLOW-UP OF THE MULTIMODAL TREATMENT STUDY OF CHILDREN WITH ATTENTION-278012009N01MH012009 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, BERK · PI HINSHAW, STEPHEN · 2002 to 2006
–
FOLLOW-UP OF THE MULTIMODAL TREATMENT STUDY OF CHILDREN WITH ATTENTION-278012008N01MH012008 · NIMH · MCGILL UNIVERSITY · PI HECHTMAN, LILY T. · 2002 to 2006
–
NIDA NIH HHS K23 DA032577NIDA NIH HHS N01 DA085548NIDA NIH HHS N01 DA085550NIDA NIH HHS N01 DA085551NIDA NIH HHS N01 DA085553NIDA NIH HHS N01 DA085554NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA039881NIMH NIH HHS N01 MH012008NIMH NIH HHS N01 MH012009NIMH NIH HHS N01 MH012010NIMH NIH HHS N01 MH012011NIMH NIH HHS N01 MH012012NIMH NIH HHS U01 MH050440NIMH NIH HHS U01 MH050461NIMH NIH HHS U01 MH050467
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo evaluate participants' perceptions about frequent use and reasons for substance use (SU) in the qualitative interview study, an add-on to the multimodal treatment study of ADHD (MTA).

methodUsing the longitudinal MTA database, 39 ADHD cases and 19 peers with Persistent SU, and 86 ADHD cases and 39 peers without Persistent SU were identified and recruited. In adulthood, an open-ended interview was administered, and SU excerpts were indexed and classified to create subtopics (frequent use and reasons for use of alcohol, marijuana, and other drugs).

resultsFor marijuana, the Persistent compared with Nonpersistent SU group had a significantly higher percentage of participants describing frequent use and giving reasons for use, and the ADHD group compared with the group of peers had a significantly higher percentage giving "stability" as a reason for use.

conclusionMotivations for persistent marijuana use may differ for adults with and without a history of ADHD.

Indexed as

Combined Modality TherapyAdolescentAdultAttention Deficit Disorder with HyperactivityFemaleHumansInterviews as TopicLongitudinal StudiesMaleQualitative ResearchSubstance-Related DisordersYoung AdultADHDmarijuanaMTA studyqualitative researchsubstance abuse

Identifiers

PMID29090967
PMCPMC6746244
OpenAlexW2765414741

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.