Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29090504›Full record

ArticleProtein science : a publication of the Protein Society2018

Computational design of membrane proteins using RosettaMembrane.

Amanda M Duran, Jens Meiler

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. One-shot design elevates functional expression levels of a voltage-gated potassium channel.Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society · 2024
    Article
  4. Modeling membrane geometries implicitly in Rosetta.Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society · 2024
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Diverse Scientific Benchmarks for Implicit Membrane Energy Functions.Journal of chemical theory and computation · 2021
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Membrane Protein Engineering with Rosetta.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2021
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Quarterly reviews of biophysics · 2020
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Amanda M DuranDepartment of Chemistry, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee, 37235.ORCID 0000-0003-2305-1049
Jens MeilerDepartment of Chemistry, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee, 37235.

Funding

Translational Analysis CoreP30DK058404 · NIDDK · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI RICHARD M. PEEK · 2002 to 2026
$29.9M
Membrane Protein Structure Elucidation from sparse NMR data (KAMP)R01GM080403 · NIGMS · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI MEILER, JENS · 2007 to 2019
$3.0M
Computational Design of Protein-Ligand Interfaces - a Therapeutic StrategyR01GM099842 · NIGMS · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI MEILER, JENS · 2012 to 2015
$1.3M
High-Performance Computer Cluster for Biomedical ResearchS10OD023680 · OD · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI MEILER, JENS · 2017 to 2017
$587k
GPU-Accelerated Parallel Computer for Drug Discovery ApplicationsS10OD020154 · OD · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI SMITH, JARROD ANSON · 2015 to 2015
$225k
NIDDK NIH HHS P30 DK058404NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM080403NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM099842NIH HHS S10 OD023680
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Computational membrane protein design is challenging due to the small number of high-resolution structures available to elucidate the physical basis of membrane protein structure, multiple functionally important conformational states, and a limited number of high-throughput biophysical assays to monitor function. However, structural determination of membrane proteins has made tremendous progress in the past years. Concurrently the field of soluble computational design has made impressive inroads. These developments allow us to tackle the formidable challenge of designing functional membrane proteins. Herein, Rosetta is benchmarked for membrane protein design. We evaluate strategies to cope with the often reduced quality of experimental membrane protein structures. Further, we test the usage of symmetry in design protocols, which is particularly important as many membrane proteins exist as homo-oligomers. We compare a soluble scoring function with a scoring function optimized for membrane proteins, RosettaMembrane. Both scoring functions recovered around half of the native sequence when completely redesigning membrane proteins. However, RosettaMembrane recovered the most native-like amino acid property composition. While leucine was overrepresented in the inner and outer-hydrophobic regions of RosettaMembrane designs, it resulted in a native-like surface hydrophobicity indicating that it is currently the best option for designing membrane proteins with Rosetta.

Indexed as

Computer SimulationSoftwareHydrophobic and Hydrophilic InteractionsMembrane ProteinsProtein MultimerizationMembrane Proteinscomputational designmembrane protein designmembrane protein engineeringmembrane proteinsRosettaRosettaMembrane

Identifiers

PMID29090504
PMCPMC5734395

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.