Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29090355›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of pediatrics2018

Microbiological comparison of blood culture and amplification of 16S rDNA methods in combination with DGGE for detection of neonatal sepsis in blood samples.

Isela García-Gudiño, Eucario Yllescas-Medrano, Rolando Maida-Claros, Diana Soriano-Becerril, Nestor F Díaz, Guadalupe García-López, Anayansí Molina-Hernández, Oscar Flores-Herrera, Francisco J Zavala-Díaz de la Serna, María Del Rosario Peralta-Pérez and 1 more

Abstract readComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of pediatrics, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 44% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trends in incidence of neonatal late-onset sepsis in very low birth weight infants: a 15-year Brazilian single center analysis.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Isela García-GudiñoDepartamento de Neonatología, Instituto Nacional de Perinatología "Isidro Espinosa de los Reyes" INPer, Mexico City, Mexico.
Eucario Yllescas-MedranoUnidad de Cuidados Intensivos Neonatales, Instituto Nacional de Perinatología "Isidro Espinosa de los Reyes" INPer, Mexico City, Mexico.
Rolando Maida-ClarosDepartamento de Neonatología, Instituto Nacional de Perinatología "Isidro Espinosa de los Reyes" INPer, Mexico City, Mexico.
Diana Soriano-BecerrilDepartamento de Infectología e Inmunología, Instituto Nacional de Perinatología "Isidro Espinosa de los Reyes" INPer, Mexico City, Mexico.
Nestor F DíazDepartamento de Fisiología y Desarrollo Celular, Instituto Nacional de Perinatología "Isidro Espinosa de los Reyes" INPer, Mexico City, Mexico.
Guadalupe García-LópezDepartamento de Fisiología y Desarrollo Celular, Instituto Nacional de Perinatología "Isidro Espinosa de los Reyes" INPer, Mexico City, Mexico.
Anayansí Molina-HernándezDepartamento de Fisiología y Desarrollo Celular, Instituto Nacional de Perinatología "Isidro Espinosa de los Reyes" INPer, Mexico City, Mexico.
Oscar Flores-HerreraDepartamento de Bioquímica, Facultad de Medicina, UNAM, Mexico City, Mexico.
Francisco J Zavala-Díaz de la SernaLaboratorio de Biotecnología, Facultad de Ciencias Químicas, Universida Autónoma de Chihuahua, Chihuahua, Mexico.
María Del Rosario Peralta-PérezLaboratorio de Biotecnología, Facultad de Ciencias Químicas, Universida Autónoma de Chihuahua, Chihuahua, Mexico.
Héctor Flores-HerreraDepartmento de Inmunobioquímica, Instituto Nacional de Perinatología "Isidro Espinosa de los Reyes" INPer, Montes Urales #800 Col. Lomas de Virreyes cp 11000. Tercer piso de la Torre de Investigación, Mexico City, Mexico. h.flores@inper.gob.mx.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7604-6158
Instituto Nacional de Perinatología · MXAutonomous University of Chihuahua · MXMexican Social Security Institute · MXUniversidad Nacional Autónoma de México · MX

Funding

Instituto Nacional de Perinatología (MX) 212250-3210101
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

It is estimated that 15% of all newborns admitted to the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) for suspected sepsis receive multiple broad-spectrum antibiotics without pathogen identification. The gold standard for bacterial sepsis detection is blood culture, but the sensitivity of this method is very low. Recently, amplification and analysis of the 16S ribosomal DNA (rDNA) bacterial gene in combination with denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis (DGGE) has proven to be a useful approach for identifying bacteria that are difficult to isolate by standard culture methods. The main goal of this study was to compare two methods used to identify bacteria associated with neonatal sepsis: blood culture and broad range 16S rDNA-DGGE. Twenty-two blood samples were obtained from newborns with (n = 15) or without (n = 7) signs and symptoms of sepsis. Blood samples were screened to identify pathogenic bacteria with two different methods: (1) bacteriological culture and (2) amplification of the variable V3 region of 16S rDNA-DGGE. Blood culture analysis was positive in 40%, whereas 16S rDNA-DGGE was positive in 87% of neonatal sepsis cases. All 16S rDNA-DGGE positive samples were associated with some other signs of neonatal sepsis.

conclusionOur study shows that the molecular approach with 16S rDNA-DGGE identifies twofold more pathogenic bacteria than bacteriological culture, including complex bacterial communities associated with the development of bacterial sepsis in neonates. What is Known: • Neonatal sepsis affects 2.3% of birth in the NICU with a high mortality risk. • Evidence supports the use of molecular methods as an alternative to blood culture for identification of bacterial associated neonatal sepsis. What is New: • The DGGE gel is a good methodological approach for the identification of bacterial in neonatal blood samples. • This study describes the pattern of electrophoretic mobility obtained by DGGE gels and allows to determine the type of bacteria associated in the development of neonatal sepsis.

Indexed as

Blood CultureDenaturing Gradient Gel ElectrophoresisCase-Control StudiesDNA, BacterialFemaleHumansInfant, NewbornMaleNeonatal SepsisRNA, Ribosomal, 16SDNA, BacterialRNA, Ribosomal, 16S16S ribosomal DNADenaturing gradient gel electrophoresisNeonatal intensive care unitNeonatal sepsis

Identifiers

PMID29090355
OpenAlexW2765739414

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.