ArticleJournal of vision2017
Children's use of visual summary statistics for material categorization.
Article in Journal of vision, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.
- Development of detection sensitivity to material properties in school-age children.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Contrast negation increases face pareidolia rates in natural scenes.Journal of vision · 2025Article
- Peripheral material perception.Journal of vision · 2024Article
- The role of texture summary statistics in material recognition from drawings and photographs.Journal of vision · 2023Article
- The Influence of Memory on Visual Perception in Infants, Children, and Adults.Cognitive science · 2023Article
- Material category of visual objects computed from specular image structure.Nature human behaviour · 2023Article
- Unsupervised learning predicts human perception and misperception of gloss.Nature human behaviour · 2021Article
- Children's use of local and global visual features for material perception.Journal of vision · 2020Article
- Article
- Memory integration into visual perception in infancy, childhood, and adulthood.CogSci ... Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society. Cognitive Science Society (U.S.). ConferenceArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Although adults' ability to recognize materials from complex natural images has been well characterized, we still know very little about the development of material perception. When do children exhibit adult-like abilities to categorize materials? What visual features do they use to do so as a function of age and material category? In the present study, we attempted to address both of these issues in two experiments that we administered to school-age children (5-10 years old) and adults. In both tasks, we asked our participants to categorize natural materials (metal, stone, water, and wood) using original images of these materials as well as synthetic images made with the Portilla-Simoncelli algorithm. By including synthetic images in our stimulus set, we were able to assess both how material categorization develops during childhood and how visual summary statistics are recruited for material perception across age groups. We observed that when asked to provide category labels for individual images (Experiment 1), young children were disproportionately bad at categorizing some materials after they were synthesized, suggesting material-specific changes in information use over the course of development. However, when asked to match real and synthetic images according to material category without labeling (Experiment 2), these effects were weakened. We conclude that while children have adult-like abilities to encode and compare images based on summary statistics, the mapping between summary statistics and category labels undergoes prolonged development during childhood.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.