ArticleReports of biochemistry & molecular biology2017
Lack of an Association between a Functional Polymorphism in the
Article in Reports of biochemistry & molecular biology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- A case-control study on the SNP309T → G and 40-bp Del1518 of the MDM2 gene and a systematic review for MDM2 polymorphisms in the patients with breast cancer.Journal of clinical laboratory analysis · 2020Pooled it
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundBreast cancer is one of the most common cancers among women worldwide. Tumor protein 53 (TP53) and its regulator, the mouse double murine 2 (MDM2) protein homologue, influence tumorigenesis through their key roles in cell division and response to DNA damage. The
methodsA case-control study with 128 female breast cancer patients and 143 healthy women was conducted. PCR-ARMS was performed to assess the
resultsNo significant association was found between the GG genotype or G allele polymorphisms and breast cancer in patients or controls (p = 0.116, OR [95% CI]: 1.267 [0.616, 2.603] and p= 0.143, OR [95% CI]: 1.326 [0.908, 1.935], respectively). For the G allele polymorphism, a significant difference of 8 years in the average cancer diagnosis age was observed between TT and TG carriers (40.57 vs. 48.15 years, respectively, p = 0.029).
conclusionThe SNP309T>G polymorphism in
Indexed as
Identifiers
29090237PMC5643450W2729104787What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.