Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29090081›Full record

ReviewTherapeutic advances in chronic disease2017

Eluxadoline in irritable bowel syndrome with diarrhea: rationale, evidence and place in therapy.

Kenneth Barshop, Kyle Staller

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Therapeutic advances in chronic disease, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Pain in irritable bowel syndrome: Does anything really help?Neurogastroenterology and motility · 2022
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Irritable Bowel Syndrome: News from an Old Disorder.GE Portuguese journal of gastroenterology · 2020
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Inhibition of CFTR-mediated intestinal chloride secretion as potential therapy for bile acid diarrhea.FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology · 2019
    Article
  9. Sex-Gender Differences in Irritable Bowel Syndrome.Journal of neurogastroenterology and motility · 2018
    Review
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Kenneth BarshopDepartment of Internal Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
Kyle StallerDivision of Gastroenterology, Center for Neurointestinal Health, Massachusetts General Hospital, 55 Fruit Street, Boston, MA 02114, USA.
Brigham and Women's Hospital · USMassachusetts General Hospital · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) is the most common gastrointestinal (GI) disorder worldwide, however treatment options for diarrhea-predominant IBS (IBS-D) remain limited. Eluxadoline, a µ- and κ-opioid receptor agonist and δ-opioid receptor antagonist, was recently approved for the treatment of IBS-D. A novel compound first described in 2008, eluxadoline was shown to normalize GI transit, with a subsequent phase I demonstrating its safety and tolerability in healthy adults. In 2016, two randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase III trials studying eluxadoline use at 75 mg and 100 mg twice daily over 26 weeks demonstrated a significant improvement in stool consistency and many global symptoms of IBS. However, the data did not demonstrate a significant advantage over placebo using the United States Food and Drug Administration (US FDA) and European Medicines Agency (EMA) endpoints for abdominal pain. Safety and tolerability data, pooled from both phase II and III studies, suggest that eluxadoline is generally well tolerated with the most common adverse events (AEs) occurring in approximately 3-8% of patients and included nausea, constipation, and abdominal pain. The most common serious adverse event (SAE) is pancreatitis, which had a 0.4% incidence. Recent US FDA reports reporting severe pancreatitis and sphincter of Oddi dysfunction after short-term use of eluxadoline in patients without a gallbladder has added a history of cholecystectomy as an important contraindication. Eluxadoline is also contraindicated in patients with a history of biliary duct obstruction, sphincter of Oddi dysfunction, active alcohol abuse, history of pancreatitis or known pancreatic duct obstruction, severe hepatic impairment, severe or chronic constipation, or known mechanical gastrointestinal obstruction. As a new drug to enter the IBS-D market, the place of eluxadoline in the hierarchy of IBS treatments is still to be determined. In this article, we review the development and clinical trial data behind the approval of eluxadoline with a focus on safety data and its use in clinical practice.

Indexed as

abdominal paindiarrheaeluxadolinefunctional GI diseaseirritable bowel syndromepancreatitis

Identifiers

PMID29090081
PMCPMC5638229
OpenAlexW2642309412

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.