ReviewFrontiers in neurology2017
The Neurological Wake-up Test-A Role in Neurocritical Care Monitoring of Traumatic Brain Injury Patients?
Review in Frontiers in neurology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 44 citations in OpenAlex.
- A Systematic Review Assessing the Current State of Automated Pupillometry in the NeuroICU.Neurocritical care · 2019Pooled it
- Optimized Endoscopic Hemostasis in Spontaneous Intracerebral Hemorrhage: A Pilot Study of the "Chopsticks" Technique.Neurosurgery practice · 2026Article
- EEG Response to Sedation Interruption Complements Behavioral Assessment After Severe Brain Injury.Annals of clinical and translational neurology · 2025Article
- Early neurological wake-up test in intubated patients with traumatic brain injury.International journal of emergency medicine · 2025Article
- Deep Learning: A Primer for Neurosurgeons.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2024Review
- The neurological wake-up test in severe pediatric traumatic brain injury: a long term, single-center experience.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2024Article
- Practice-Pattern Variation in Sedation of Neurotrauma Patients in the Intensive Care Unit: An International Survey.Journal of intensive care medicine · 2023Article
- Early Shared Decision-Making for Older Adults with Traumatic Brain Injury: Using Time-Limited Trials and Understanding Their Limitations.Neurocritical care · 2023Article
- Mechanical Ventilation in Patients with Traumatic Brain Injury: Is it so Different?Neurocritical care · 2023Review
- Early sedation in traumatic brain injury: a multicentre international observational study.Critical care and resuscitation : journal of the Australasian Academy of Critical Care Medicine · 2022Article
- Initial neurocritical care of severe traumatic brain injury: New paradigms and old challenges.Surgical neurology international · 2022Review
- Consensus Statement on Analgo-sedation in Neurocritical Care and Review of Literature.Indian journal of critical care medicine : peer-reviewed, official publication of Indian Society of Critical Care Medicine · 2021Article
- Neurologic Assessment of the Neurocritical Care Patient.Frontiers in neurology · 2021Review
- Association of the bleeding time test with aspects of traumatic brain injury in patients with alcohol use disorder.Acta neurochirurgica · 2020Article
- Escalate and De-Escalate Therapies for Intracranial Pressure Control in Traumatic Brain Injury.Frontiers in neurology · 2020Review
- Machine learning-based dynamic mortality prediction after traumatic brain injury.Scientific reports · 2019Observational
- Intensive Care in Traumatic Brain Injury Including Multi-Modal Monitoring and Neuroprotection.Medical sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2019Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The most fundamental clinical monitoring tool in traumatic brain injury (TBI) patients is the repeated clinical examination. In the severe TBI patient treated by continuous sedation in a neurocritical care (NCC) unit, sedation interruption is required to enable a clinical evaluation (named the neurological wake-up test; NWT) assessing the level of consciousness, pupillary diameter and reactivity to light, and presence of focal neurological deficits. There is a basic conflict regarding the NWT in the NCC setting; can the clinical information obtained by the NWT justify the risk of inducing a stress response in a severe TBI patient? Furthermore, in the presence of advanced multimodal monitoring and neuroimaging, is the NWT necessary to identify important clinical alterations? In studies of severe TBI patients, the NWT was consistently shown to induce a stress reaction including brief increases in intracranial pressure (ICP) and changes in cerebral perfusion pressure (CPP). However, it has not been established whether these short-lived ICP and CPP changes are detrimental to the injured brain. Daily interruption of sedation is associated with a reduced ventilator time, shorter hospital stay and reduced mortality in many studies of general intensive care unit patients, although such clinical benefits have not been firmly established in TBI. To date, there is no consensus on the use of the NWT among NCC units and systematic studies are scarce. Thus, additional studies evaluating the role of the NWT in clinical decision-making are needed. Multimodal NCC monitoring may be an adjunct in assessing in which TBI patients the NWT can be safely performed. At present, the NWT remains the golden standard for clinical monitoring and detection of neurological changes in NCC and could be considered in TBI patients with stable baseline ICP and CPP readings. The focus of the present review is an overview of the existing literature on the role of the NWT as a clinical monitoring tool for severe TBI patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.