Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29089803›Full record

ArticleCurrent oncology (Toronto, Ont.)2017

Conditional survival after a diagnosis of malignant brain tumour in Canada: 2000-2008.

Y Yuan, J Ross, Q Shi, F G Davis

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.), 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Y YuanSchool of Public Health, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB.
J RossSchool of Public Health, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB.
Q ShiSchool of Public Health, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB.
F G DavisSchool of Public Health, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

background"Conditional survival probability" is defined as the probability that a patient will survive an additional time, given that the patient has already survived a defined period of time after diagnosis. Such estimates might be more relevant for clinicians and patients during post-diagnosis care, because survival probability projections are based on the patient's survival to date. Here, we provides the first population-based estimates of conditional survival probabilities by histology for brain cancer in Canada.

methodsCanadian Cancer Registry data were accessed for patients diagnosed with primary brain cancers during 2000-2008. Kaplan-Meier survival probabilities were estimated by histology. Conditional survival probabilities at 6 months (short-term, denoted scs) and 2 years (long-term, denoted lcs) were derived from the Kaplan-Meier survival estimates for a range of time periods.

resultsAmong the 20,875 patients who met the study criteria, scs increased by a margin of 16-18 percentage points from 6-month survivors to 2-year survivors for the three most aggressive brain cancers. The lcs for 2-year survivors was 66% or greater for all tumour groups except glioblastoma. The lcs for 4-year survivors was 62% or greater for all histologies. For glioblastoma and diffuse astrocytoma, the lcs increased each year after diagnosis. For all other histologies, the lcs first increased and then plateaued from 2 years after diagnosis. The lcs and scs both worsened with increasing older age at diagnosis. SUMMARY: We report histologically specific conditional survival probabilities that can have value for clinicians practicing in Canada as they plan the course of follow-up for individual patients with brain cancer.

Indexed as

brain cancerbrain neoplasmsbrain tumoursConditional survivalsurvival

Identifiers

PMID29089803
PMCPMC5659157

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.