ArticleCurrent oncology (Toronto, Ont.)2017
Conditional survival after a diagnosis of malignant brain tumour in Canada: 2000-2008.
Article in Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.), 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Incidence and survival of adult central nervous system tumors in the Veneto region: a population-based registry study (2016-2020).Journal of neuro-oncology · 2025Article
- Regional Variability in Survival for Patients Diagnosed with Selected Central Nervous System Tumours in Canada.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2024Article
- Health-Related Quality of Life for Patients Receiving Tumor Treating Fields for Glioblastoma.Frontiers in oncology · 2021Article
- Epidemiology and survival analyses of 333 adult glioma patients from Eastern Algeria (2008-2016).African health sciences · 2020Article
- Conditional Survival After Resection for Pancreatic Cancer: A Population-Based Study and Prediction Model.Annals of surgical oncology · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
background"Conditional survival probability" is defined as the probability that a patient will survive an additional time, given that the patient has already survived a defined period of time after diagnosis. Such estimates might be more relevant for clinicians and patients during post-diagnosis care, because survival probability projections are based on the patient's survival to date. Here, we provides the first population-based estimates of conditional survival probabilities by histology for brain cancer in Canada.
methodsCanadian Cancer Registry data were accessed for patients diagnosed with primary brain cancers during 2000-2008. Kaplan-Meier survival probabilities were estimated by histology. Conditional survival probabilities at 6 months (short-term, denoted scs) and 2 years (long-term, denoted lcs) were derived from the Kaplan-Meier survival estimates for a range of time periods.
resultsAmong the 20,875 patients who met the study criteria, scs increased by a margin of 16-18 percentage points from 6-month survivors to 2-year survivors for the three most aggressive brain cancers. The lcs for 2-year survivors was 66% or greater for all tumour groups except glioblastoma. The lcs for 4-year survivors was 62% or greater for all histologies. For glioblastoma and diffuse astrocytoma, the lcs increased each year after diagnosis. For all other histologies, the lcs first increased and then plateaued from 2 years after diagnosis. The lcs and scs both worsened with increasing older age at diagnosis. SUMMARY: We report histologically specific conditional survival probabilities that can have value for clinicians practicing in Canada as they plan the course of follow-up for individual patients with brain cancer.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.