Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29089798›Full record

ArticleCurrent oncology (Toronto, Ont.)2017

Neoadjuvant systemic therapy in breast cancer: use and trends in radiotherapy practice.

T A Koulis, K Beecham, C Speers, S Tyldesley, D Voduc, C Simmons, R Olson

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.), 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 48% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

T A KoulisBC Cancer Agency-Centre for the North, Radiation Oncology Department, Prince George, BC (currently: BC Cancer Agency-Sindi Ahluwalia Hawkins Centre for Southern Interior, Kelowna, BC).
K BeechamSweden Ghana Medical Centre, Accra, Ghana; and.
C SpeersBC Cancer Agency, Breast Cancer Outcomes Unit.
S TyldesleyUniversity of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC.
D VoducUniversity of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC.
C SimmonsUniversity of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC.
R OlsonBC Cancer Agency-Centre for the North, Radiation Oncology Department, Prince George, BC (currently: BC Cancer Agency-Sindi Ahluwalia Hawkins Centre for Southern Interior, Kelowna, BC).
BC Cancer Agency · CAUniversity of British Columbia · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe use of neoadjuvant systemic therapy (nast) in the treatment of breast cancer is increasing, and the role of adjuvant radiation therapy (rt) in that setting is uncertain. We sought to review and report the use of nast, its trends over time, and its relationship with the prescribing patterns of locoregional rt in a provincial cancer system.

methodsPatients with stages i-iii breast cancer diagnosed during 2007-2012 were identified using a provincial database. Patient, tumour, and treatment characteristics were extracted. Multivariable logistic regression analyses were used to assess associations with the use of nast. Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression were used for survival analyses.

resultsOf the 11,658 patients who met the inclusion criteria, 602 (5%) had received nast. Use of nast was more frequent in stage iii patients (53%) than in stages i and ii patients (2%). In clinically lymph-node positive patients, a pathology assessment was made approximately 50% of the time. Higher clinical tumour stage and increasing clinical nodal stage predicted for increasing use of nast and of nodal rt after nast, but pathologic nodal status after nast was not associated with use of nodal rt. A statistically significant survival difference was observed between patients in the nast and no-nast groups, but that significance disappeared in a multivariable Cox regression analysis.

conclusionsThis population-based study demonstrated 5% use of nast for breast cancer. Most patients received nodal rt after nast, and nodal rt was not associated with pathologic stage after nast. Findings likely reflect the realities of clinical practice and show that reliance on clinical nodal staging results in outcomes similar to those reported in the literature.

Indexed as

Breast cancerneoadjuvant systemic therapiesnodal irradiationnodal stagingradiotherapy

Identifiers

PMID29089798
PMCPMC5659152
OpenAlexW2765758613

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.