ArticleP & T : a peer-reviewed journal for formulary management2017
The Use of Idarucizumab for Dabigatran Reversal in Clinical Practice: A Case Series.
Article in P & T : a peer-reviewed journal for formulary management, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 17 citations in OpenAlex.
- Dabigatran Reversal With Idarucizumab and In-Hospital Mortality in Intracranial Hemorrhage: A Systematic Review of Real-Life Data From Case Reports and Case Series.Frontiers in neurology · 2021Pooled it
- Standard operating procedure for idarucizumab reversal of dabigatran anticoagulation in ischemic and hemorrhagic stroke.Journal of thrombosis and thrombolysis · 2023Review
- Role of Direct Oral Anticoagulants for Post-operative Venous Thromboembolism Prophylaxis.European cardiology · 2022Review
- Acute kidney injury and undiagnosed immunoglobulin A nephropathy after dabigatran therapy.Proceedings (Baylor University. Medical Center) · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo describe the use of idarucizumab (Praxbind, Boehringer Ingelheim) in routine clinical practice at a large urban academic medical center. SUMMARY: Seven total doses of idarucizumab were administered to six unique patients from October 31, 2015, to October 31, 2016. The reversal agent was used in conjunction with local bleeding control measures, blood product transfusions, and acid-suppressive therapy. In 86% of cases, idarucizumab administration resulted in a successful cessation of bleeding by clinical assessment. Two patients expired due to coexisting conditions. Idarucizumab was administered to patients with normal baseline coagulation tests in 43% of cases. No adverse reactions related to idarucizumab were reported.
conclusionsIdarucizumab administration resulted in successful resolution of bleeding by clinical assessment. The therapy for acute bleeding with use of dabigatran (Pradaxa, Boehringer Ingelheim) remains supportive care, in addition to idarucizumab in cases of severe or uncontrolled bleeding. Development of institution-specific protocols and better guidance for using baseline coagulation tests are needed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
29089726PMC5642159W2798083822What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.