Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29089063›Full record

Trial reportParasites & vectors2017

A randomized, controlled field study to assess the efficacy and safety of lotilaner flavored chewable tablets (Credelio™) in eliminating fleas in client-owned dogs in the USA.

Daniela Karadzovska, Kimberly Chappell, Shane Coble, Martin Murphy, Daniela Cavalleri, Scott Wiseman, Jason Drake, Steve Nanchen

Open access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Parasites & vectors, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Efficacy of lotilaner (CredelioParasites & vectors · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Lotilaner Ophthalmic Solution, 0.25%, for the Treatment ofHealthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Daniela KaradzovskaElanco Animal Health, Yarrandoo, NSW, Australia.
Kimberly ChappellElanco Animal Health, 2500 Innovation Way, Greenfield, IN, 46140, USA.
Shane CobleElanco Animal Health, 2500 Innovation Way, Greenfield, IN, 46140, USA.
Martin MurphyElanco Animal Health, Mattenstrasse 24a, 4058, Basel, Switzerland.
Daniela CavalleriElanco Animal Health, Mattenstrasse 24a, 4058, Basel, Switzerland.
Scott WisemanElanco Animal Health, Basingstoke, Hants, UK.
Jason DrakeElanco Animal Health, 2500 Innovation Way, Greenfield, IN, 46140, USA. drake_jon_j@elanco.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6203-0852
Steve NanchenElanco Animal Health, Mattenstrasse 24a, 4058, Basel, Switzerland.
Elanco (United States) · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPreclinical studies have shown that the novel isoxazoline, lotilaner (Credelio™, Elanco) administered orally to dogs, produces rapid flea and tick knockdown and sustained speed of kill for at least a month post-treatment with a wide safety margin. A field study was undertaken to validate pre-clinical results.

methodsDogs were enrolled at 10 veterinary clinics across the United States. Qualifying households containing up to three dogs and one primary dog with at least 10 fleas were randomized 2:1 to receive lotilaner (Credelio™, Elanco) at the recommended minimum dose of 20 mg/kg, or afoxolaner (Nexgard®, Merial), administered per label, to give a minimum dose of 2.5 mg/kg. Treatments were dispensed on Days 0, 30 and 60 for administration by owners; all household dogs received the same treatment as the primary dog. Post-enrollment flea and tick counts were made on primary dogs on Days 30, 60 and 90, and all dogs were assessed for tablet palatability and safety.

resultsFor efficacy assessments, data were used from 111 lotilaner-treated dogs and 50 afoxolaner-treated dogs; for safety, 197 and 86 dogs, respectively. Percent reductions from baseline in geometric mean flea counts for the lotilaner group were 99.3, 99.9 and 100% on Days 30, 60 and 90, respectively, and for afoxolaner 98.3, 99.8 and 99.8% (P < 0.001, both groups, all days). On Day 90, 100% of lotilaner-treated dogs and 93% of afoxolaner-treated dogs were flea-free. Too few ticks were present to allow assessment. There were no differences in palatability between products (P = 0.2132), with, respectively, 94% and 96% of lotilaner and afoxolaner treatments accepted when offered by hand, in an empty food bowl or with food. Both treatments were well tolerated, alleviating clinical signs of flea allergy dermatitis (FAD) in dogs affected at enrollment.

conclusionA single owner-administered lotilaner treatment was greater than 99% effective in reducing mean flea counts within 30 days. Three consecutive monthly lotilaner treatments resulted in a 100% reduction in flea infestations, and a substantial reduction in signs of FAD. Lotilaner flavored tablets were readily accepted under field conditions. The absence of treatment-related adverse events confirms the safety of lotilaner in dogs.

Indexed as

Administration, OralAnimalsDog DiseasesDogsFlea InfestationsHospitals, AnimalInsecticidesIsoxazolesNaphthalenesSiphonapteraTabletsUnited StatesafoxolanerInsecticidesIsoxazolesNaphthalenesTabletsAfoxolanerCredelioDogsField studyFleasLotilaner

Identifiers

PMID29089063
PMCPMC5664423
OpenAlexW4240630809

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.