Trial reportParasites & vectors2017
Laboratory evaluations of the immediate and sustained efficacy of lotilaner (Credelio™) against four common species of ticks affecting dogs in North America.
Trial report in Parasites & vectors, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
24 citing papers in PubMed, 37 citations in OpenAlex.
- Two randomized, controlled studies to assess the efficacy and safety of lotilaner (Credelio™) in preventing Dermacentor reticulatus transmission of Babesia canis to dogs.Parasites & vectors · 2017Trial
- Laboratory evaluations of the immediate and sustained effectiveness of lotilaner (Credelio™) against three common species of ticks affecting dogs in Europe.Parasites & vectors · 2017Trial
- Laboratory evaluation of the speed of kill of lotilaner (Credelio™) against Ixodes ricinus ticks on dogs.Parasites & vectors · 2017Trial
- Safety evaluation of lotilaner in dogs after oral administration as flavoured chewable tablets (Credelio™).Parasites & vectors · 2017Trial
- A randomised, blinded, controlled field study to assess the efficacy and safety of lotilaner tablets (Credelio™) in controlling fleas in client-owned dogs in European countries.Parasites & vectors · 2017Trial
- A randomized, controlled study to assess the efficacy and safety of lotilaner (Credelio™) in controlling ticks in client-owned dogs in Europe.Parasites & vectors · 2017Trial
- Efficacy of lotilaner (CredelioParasites & vectors · 2026Article
- Ectoparasitic prevention compliance in dogs based on prescription records from veterinary practices in Poland.Parasites & vectors · 2026Article
- Efficacy of a novel chewable tablet (Credelio Quattro™) containing lotilaner, moxidectin, praziquantel, and pyrantel for the prevention of heartworm disease (Dirofilaria immitis) in dogs.Parasites & vectors · 2026Article
- Long-term safety of Credelio Quattro™ (lotilaner, moxidectin, praziquantel, and pyrantel chewable tablets), a novel orally administered combination endectocide for dogs.Parasites & vectors · 2025Article
- Efficacy evaluation of lotilaner (Credelio™) in experimentally induced Otodectes cynotis infestations in cats.Parasites & vectors · 2025Article
- Safety of Credelio Quattro™ (lotilaner, moxidectin, praziquantel, and pyrantel chewable tablets) in dogs infected with adult heartworms (Dirofilaria immitis).Parasites & vectors · 2025Article
- A scoping review of applied tick control research in North America: funding, implementation, and advancement.Journal of medical entomology · 2025Article
- Field study to investigate the effectiveness and safety of a novel orally administered combination drug product containing milbemycin oxime and lotilaner (CredelioParasites & vectors · 2021Article
- Field study to investigate the effectiveness and safety of a novel orally administered combination drug product containing milbemycin oxime and lotilaner (CredelioParasites & vectors · 2021Article
- The molecular targets of ivermectin and lotilaner in the human louse Pediculus humanus humanus: New prospects for the treatment of pediculosis.PLoS pathogens · 2021Article
- Recent Advancements in the Control of Cat Fleas.Insects · 2020Review
- Laboratory evaluation of the efficacy of lotilaner (Credelio™) against Amblyomma cajennense (sensu lato) infestations of dogs.Parasites & vectors · 2018Article
- Laboratory evaluations of the 3-month efficacy of oral lotilaner (Credelio™) against experimental infestations of dogs with the Australian paralysis tick, Ixodes holocyclus.Parasites & vectors · 2018Article
- Laboratory evaluation of the efficacy of lotilaner (Credelio™) against Haemaphysalis longicornis infestations of dogs.Parasites & vectors · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundEffective control of tick infestations on dogs is important to reduce the risk of transmission of bacterial, viral, and protozoal pathogens. Laboratory studies were initiated to determine the efficacy of lotilaner against common ticks infesting dogs in the United States.
methodsEight studies investigated the efficacy of lotilaner against ticks. In two studies dogs were infested with both Dermacentor variabilis and Rhipicephalus sanguineus: one additional study was completed for each of these species. Two studies assessed infestations with Amblyomma americanum and two with Ixodes scapularis. In all studies, dogs were ranked and blocked by counts from pre-treatment infestations and randomly allocated, at least eight per group, to be treated orally with lotilaner (minimum dose rate 20 mg/kg), or to be untreated controls. Treatments were administered on Day 0, within 30 min after dogs were fed. In all studies, infestations were performed with 50 adult ticks on Days -2, 7, 14, 21 and 28, and also on Day 35 for R. sanguineus, D. variabilis and I. scapularis. Tick counts were completed 48 h after treatment or after each subsequent challenge. An adequate infestation was defined as at least 25% of the infestation dose recovered from each of at least six control animals at each evaluation. Efficacy calculations for the primary objective were based on geometric means.
resultsIn all studies, lotilaner was 100% effective against existing infestations. For post-treatment assessments, on only two occasions did efficacy fall below 99%: in one D. variabilis study efficacy was 98.0% on Day 35 and in one I. scapularis study efficacy on Day 16 was 98.4%. Only mild and transient adverse events were observed, and none were considered to be related to treatment.
conclusionLotilaner was completely effective against existing infestations with four common species of ticks, D. variabilis, R. sanguineus, A. americanum and I. scapularis, that affect dogs in North America, with at least 4 weeks efficacy of 98.0% or more against subsequent challenge infestations. These results show that lotilaner is a highly effective isoxazoline that offers sustained efficacy against ticks through and beyond the one-month end-of-dose treatment interval.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.