Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29089057›Full record

Trial reportParasites & vectors2017

Laboratory evaluations of the immediate and sustained efficacy of lotilaner (Credelio™) against four common species of ticks affecting dogs in North America.

Martin Murphy, Roberto Garcia, Daniela Karadzovska, Daniela Cavalleri, Dan Snyder, Wolfgang Seewald, Theresa Real, Jason Drake, Scott Wiseman, Steve Nanchen

Open access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Parasites & vectors, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
3.8field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 37 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Efficacy of lotilaner (CredelioParasites & vectors · 2026
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Martin MurphyElanco Animal Health, Mattenstrasse 24a, 4058, Basel, Switzerland.
Roberto GarciaElanco Animal Health, 2500 Innovation Way, Greenfield, IN, 46140, USA.
Daniela KaradzovskaElanco Animal Health, Yarrandoo, NSW, Australia.
Daniela CavalleriElanco Animal Health, Mattenstrasse 24a, 4058, Basel, Switzerland.
Dan SnyderElanco Animal Health, 2500 Innovation Way, Greenfield, IN, 46140, USA.
Wolfgang SeewaldElanco Animal Health, Mattenstrasse 24a, 4058, Basel, Switzerland.
Theresa RealElanco Animal Health, 2500 Innovation Way, Greenfield, IN, 46140, USA.
Jason DrakeElanco Animal Health, 2500 Innovation Way, Greenfield, IN, 46140, USA. drake_jon_j@elanco.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6203-0852
Scott WisemanElanco Animal Health, Southampton, Hants, UK.
Steve NanchenElanco Animal Health, Mattenstrasse 24a, 4058, Basel, Switzerland.
Elanco (United States) · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEffective control of tick infestations on dogs is important to reduce the risk of transmission of bacterial, viral, and protozoal pathogens. Laboratory studies were initiated to determine the efficacy of lotilaner against common ticks infesting dogs in the United States.

methodsEight studies investigated the efficacy of lotilaner against ticks. In two studies dogs were infested with both Dermacentor variabilis and Rhipicephalus sanguineus: one additional study was completed for each of these species. Two studies assessed infestations with Amblyomma americanum and two with Ixodes scapularis. In all studies, dogs were ranked and blocked by counts from pre-treatment infestations and randomly allocated, at least eight per group, to be treated orally with lotilaner (minimum dose rate 20 mg/kg), or to be untreated controls. Treatments were administered on Day 0, within 30 min after dogs were fed. In all studies, infestations were performed with 50 adult ticks on Days -2, 7, 14, 21 and 28, and also on Day 35 for R. sanguineus, D. variabilis and I. scapularis. Tick counts were completed 48 h after treatment or after each subsequent challenge. An adequate infestation was defined as at least 25% of the infestation dose recovered from each of at least six control animals at each evaluation. Efficacy calculations for the primary objective were based on geometric means.

resultsIn all studies, lotilaner was 100% effective against existing infestations. For post-treatment assessments, on only two occasions did efficacy fall below 99%: in one D. variabilis study efficacy was 98.0% on Day 35 and in one I. scapularis study efficacy on Day 16 was 98.4%. Only mild and transient adverse events were observed, and none were considered to be related to treatment.

conclusionLotilaner was completely effective against existing infestations with four common species of ticks, D. variabilis, R. sanguineus, A. americanum and I. scapularis, that affect dogs in North America, with at least 4 weeks efficacy of 98.0% or more against subsequent challenge infestations. These results show that lotilaner is a highly effective isoxazoline that offers sustained efficacy against ticks through and beyond the one-month end-of-dose treatment interval.

Indexed as

AcaricidesAdministration, OralAnimalsDermacentorDog DiseasesDogsFemaleIxodesIxodidaeMaleNorth AmericaRhipicephalus sanguineusTick InfestationsTime FactorsAcaricidesAmblyommaCredelioDermacentorDogIxodesLotilanerRhipicephalusTicks

Identifiers

PMID29089057
PMCPMC5664823
OpenAlexW2765754247

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.