Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29088832›Full record

ArticleOncotarget2017

Immunohistochemistry cannot replace DNA analysis for evaluation of

Monika Szymonek, Artur Kowalik, Janusz Kopczyński, Danuta Gąsior-Perczak, Iwona Pałyga, Agnieszka Walczyk, Klaudia Gadawska-Juszczyk, Agnieszka Płusa, Ryszard Mężyk, Magdalena Chrapek and 2 more

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Oncotarget, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. VE1 immunohistochemistry is an adjunct tool for detection of BRAFJournal of clinical laboratory analysis · 2021
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Monika SzymonekEndocrinology Clinic, Holycross Cancer Center, Kielce, Poland.
Artur KowalikDepartment of Molecular Diagnostics, Holycross Cancer Center, Kielce, Poland.
Janusz KopczyńskiDepartment of Surgical Pathology, Holycross Cancer Center, Kielce, Poland.
Danuta Gąsior-PerczakEndocrinology Clinic, Holycross Cancer Center, Kielce, Poland.
Iwona PałygaEndocrinology Clinic, Holycross Cancer Center, Kielce, Poland.
Agnieszka WalczykEndocrinology Clinic, Holycross Cancer Center, Kielce, Poland.
Klaudia Gadawska-JuszczykEndocrinology Clinic, Holycross Cancer Center, Kielce, Poland.
Agnieszka PłusaDepartment of Surgical Pathology, Holycross Cancer Center, Kielce, Poland.
Ryszard MężykCancer Epidemiology, Holycross Cancer Center, Kielce, Poland.
Magdalena ChrapekDepartment of Probability Theory and Statistics Institute of Mathematics, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Science, Jan Kochanowski University, Kielce, Poland.
Stanisław GóźdźOncology Clinic, Holycross Cancer Center, Kielce, Poland.
Aldona KowalskaEndocrinology Clinic, Holycross Cancer Center, Kielce, Poland.
Holy Cross University · PLJan Kochanowski University · PLInstitute of Mathematics · PL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe MATERIALS AND

methodsIn 140 patients with classical PTC, the status of the

resultsThe

conclusionsThe results obtained in this study indicate a lack of concordance between

Indexed as

BRAF V600Eimmunohistochemistrypapillary thyroid cancerqPCRSanger sequencing

Identifiers

PMID29088832
PMCPMC5650387
OpenAlexW2749059209

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.