ReviewChirurgia (Bucharest, Romania : 1990)
Damage Control Resuscitation.
Review in Chirurgia (Bucharest, Romania : 1990). The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Increased prehospital to total blood product administration associated with improved hospital outcomes: A secondary analysis of hemorrhagic shock trials.The journal of trauma and acute care surgery · 2026Article
- Time-limited association between plasma transfusion and mortality in pediatric traumatic brain injury.The journal of trauma and acute care surgery · 2025Article
- Assessing the Effectiveness and Accessibility of Trauma Care in East London: A Comprehensive Evaluation.Cureus · 2025Review
- Assessment of polytrauma patient management in India.Bioinformation · 2025Article
- Impact of Immunopathy and Coagulopathy on Multi-Organ Failure and Mortality in a Lethal Porcine Model of Controlled and Uncontrolled Hemorrhage.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Article
- Gunshot Abdominal Injuries: A Report of Two Cases and a Review of the Literature.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2023Review
- From Death Triad to Death Tetrad-The Addition of a Hypotension Component to the Death Triad Improves Mortality Risk Stratification in Trauma Patients: A Retrospective Cohort Study.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Permissive Hypotension vs. Conventional Resuscitation in Patients With Trauma or Hemorrhagic Shock: A Review.Cureus · 2021Review
- Article
- Effects of multidisciplinary model of damage control on acute cervical spinal cord injury in winter Olympic sports.American journal of translational research · 2021Article
- Hemicorporectomy as a life-saving strategy for severe pelvic ring crush injury: a case report.European journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie · 2018Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Damage control surgery is a combination of temporizing surgical interventions to arrest hemorrhage and control infectious source, with goal directed resuscitation to restore normal physiology. The convention of damage control surgery largely arose following the discovery of the lethal triad of hypothermia, acidosis, and coagulopathy, with the goal of Damage Control Surgery (DCS) is to avoid the initiation of this "bloody vicious cycle" or to reverse its progression. While hypothermia and acidosis are generally corrected with resuscitation, coagulopathy remains a challenging aspect of DCS, and is exacerbated by excessive crystalloid administration. This chapter focuses on resuscitative principles in the four settings of trauma care: the prehospital setting, emergency department, operating room, and intensive care unit including historical perspectives, resuscitative methods, controversies, and future directions. Each setting provides unique challenges with specific goals of care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.