Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29088396›Full record

ArticleBiology of reproduction2017

Cell-based computational model of early ovarian development in mice.

Hannah M Wear, Annika Eriksson, Humphrey Hung-Chang Yao, Karen H Watanabe

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biology of reproduction, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. How relevant is the mouse model for understanding human sex determination?International journal of biological sciences · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Hannah M WearInstitute of Environmental Health, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA.
Annika ErikssonDivision of Medical Informatics and Clinical Epidemiology, Oregon Health & Science University Portland, OR, USA.
Humphrey Hung-Chang YaoReproductive Developmental Biology Group, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, Research Triangle Park, NC, USA.
Karen H WatanabeInstitute of Environmental Health, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA.
Oregon Health & Science University · USNational Institute of Environmental Health Sciences · US

Funding

Impacts of Genetic and Environmental Factors on Reproductive Organ DevelopmentZIAES102965 · NIEHS · NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH SCIENCES · PI YAO, HUMPHREY · 2011 to 2025
$32.8M
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite its importance to reproduction, certain mechanisms of early ovarian development remain a mystery. To improve our understanding, we constructed the first cell-based computational model of ovarian development in mice that is divided into two phases: Phase I spans embryonic day 5.5 (E5.5) to E12.5; and Phase II spans E12.5 to postnatal day 2. We used the model to investigate four mechanisms: in Phase I, (i) whether primordial germ cells (PGCs) undergo mitosis during migration; and (ii) if the mechanism for secretion of KIT ligand from the hindgut resembles inductive cell-cell signaling or is secreted in a static manner; and in Phase II, (iii) that changes in cellular adhesion produce germ cell nest breakdown; and (iv) whether localization of primordial follicles in the cortex of the ovary is due to proliferation of granulosa cells. We found that the combination of the first three hypotheses produced results that aligned with experimental images and PGC abundance data. Results from the fourth hypothesis did not match experimental images, which suggests that more detailed processes are involved in follicle localization. Phase I and Phase II of the model reproduce experimentally observed cell counts and morphology well. A sensitivity analysis identified contact energies, mitotic rates, KIT chemotaxis strength, and diffusion rate in Phase I and oocyte death rate in Phase II as parameters with the greatest impact on model predictions. The results demonstrate that the computational model can be used to understand unknown mechanisms, generate new hypotheses, and serve as an educational tool.

Indexed as

Computational BiologyComputer SimulationAnimalsCell AdhesionCell MovementEmbryonic DevelopmentFemaleGerm CellsGranulosa CellsMiceMitosisMonte Carlo MethodOvaryPregnancySex DifferentiationSignal TransductionStem Cell Factorcell-based modelcomputational modeldevelopmental biologymiceovarian developmentovary

Identifiers

PMID29088396
PMCPMC6231088
OpenAlexW2748726951

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.