ArticleBiology of reproduction2017
Cell-based computational model of early ovarian development in mice.
Article in Biology of reproduction, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Digital analysis of ovarian tissue: generating a standardized method of follicle analysis†.Biology of reproduction · 2025Article
- How relevant is the mouse model for understanding human sex determination?International journal of biological sciences · 2025Article
- The homeobox gene TGIF1 is required for chicken ovarian cortical development and generation of the juxtacortical medulla.Development (Cambridge, England) · 2021Article
- Applying Single-Cell Analysis to Gonadogenesis and DSDs (Disorders/Differences of Sex Development).International journal of molecular sciences · 2020Review
- Gonadal Sex Differentiation: Supporting Versus Steroidogenic Cell Lineage Specification in Mammals and Birds.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Despite its importance to reproduction, certain mechanisms of early ovarian development remain a mystery. To improve our understanding, we constructed the first cell-based computational model of ovarian development in mice that is divided into two phases: Phase I spans embryonic day 5.5 (E5.5) to E12.5; and Phase II spans E12.5 to postnatal day 2. We used the model to investigate four mechanisms: in Phase I, (i) whether primordial germ cells (PGCs) undergo mitosis during migration; and (ii) if the mechanism for secretion of KIT ligand from the hindgut resembles inductive cell-cell signaling or is secreted in a static manner; and in Phase II, (iii) that changes in cellular adhesion produce germ cell nest breakdown; and (iv) whether localization of primordial follicles in the cortex of the ovary is due to proliferation of granulosa cells. We found that the combination of the first three hypotheses produced results that aligned with experimental images and PGC abundance data. Results from the fourth hypothesis did not match experimental images, which suggests that more detailed processes are involved in follicle localization. Phase I and Phase II of the model reproduce experimentally observed cell counts and morphology well. A sensitivity analysis identified contact energies, mitotic rates, KIT chemotaxis strength, and diffusion rate in Phase I and oocyte death rate in Phase II as parameters with the greatest impact on model predictions. The results demonstrate that the computational model can be used to understand unknown mechanisms, generate new hypotheses, and serve as an educational tool.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.