Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29088238›Full record

ArticlePloS one2017

Comparison of the transcriptomic analysis between two Chinese white pear (Pyrus bretschneideri Rehd.) genotypes of different stone cells contents.

Jinyun Zhang, Xi Cheng, Qing Jin, Xueqiang Su, Manli Li, Chongchong Yan, Xiaoyu Jiao, Daihui Li, Yi Lin, Yongping Cai

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 50 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Comparative Genomic Analysis ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Comparative Genomic Analysis ofFrontiers in genetics · 2021
    Article
  12. Comparative genomic analysis of superoxide dismutase (Physiology and molecular biology of plants : an international journal of functional plant biology · 2021
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Frontiers in genetics · 2019
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Jinyun ZhangSchool of Life Science, Anhui Agricultural University, Hefei, China.
Xi ChengSchool of Life Science, Anhui Agricultural University, Hefei, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5669-7092
Qing JinSchool of Life Science, Anhui Agricultural University, Hefei, China.
Xueqiang SuSchool of Life Science, Anhui Agricultural University, Hefei, China.
Manli LiSchool of Life Science, Anhui Agricultural University, Hefei, China.
Chongchong YanHorticultural Institute, Anhui Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Hefei, Anhui, China.
Xiaoyu JiaoSchool of Life Science, Anhui Agricultural University, Hefei, China.
Daihui LiSchool of Life Science, Anhui Agricultural University, Hefei, China.
Yi LinSchool of Life Science, Anhui Agricultural University, Hefei, China.
Yongping CaiSchool of Life Science, Anhui Agricultural University, Hefei, China.
Anhui Agricultural University · CNAnhui Academy of Agricultural Sciences · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Stone cell content is thought to be one of the key determinants for fruit quality in pears. However, the molecular mechanism of stone cell development remains poorly understood. In this study, we found that the stone cell clusters (SCCs) distribution and area in 'Dangshan Su' (with abundant stone cells) were higher as compared to 'Lianglizaosu' (low stone cell content bud sport of 'Dangshan Su') based on the histochemical staining, and the correlations of lignin content with stone cell content and SCC area was significant. The fruits of 'Dangshan Su' and 'Lianglizaosu' at three different developmental stages (23 and 55 days after flowering and mature) were sampled for comparative transcriptome analysis to explore the metabolic pathways associated with stone cell development. A total of 42444 unigenes were obtained from two varieties, among which 7203 differentially expressed genes (DEGs) were identified by comparison of the six transcriptomes. Specifically, many DEGs associated with lignin biosynthesis were identified, including coumaroylquinate 3-monooxygenase (C3H), shikimate O-hydroxycinnamoyltransferase (HCT), ferulate 5-hydroxylase (F5H), cinnamyl alcohol dehydrogenase (CAD) and peroxidase (POD), as well as genes related to carbon metabolism, such as sorbitol dehydrogenase-like (SDH-like) and ATP-dependent 6-phosphofructokinase (ATP-PFK). At the peak of the stone cell content (55 days after flowering), the expression level of these genes in 'Dangshan Su' was significantly increased compared with 'Lianglizaosu', indicating that these genes were closely related to stone cell development. We validated the transcriptional levels of 33 DEGs using quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR) analysis. The results were consistent with the transcriptome analysis, indicating the reliability of transcriptome data. In addition, subcellular localization analysis of three DEGs in lignin synthesis (PbC3H, PbF5H and PbPOD) revealed that these proteins are mainly distributed in the cell membrane and cytoplasm. These results provide new insights into the molecular mechanism of stone cell formation.

Indexed as

FruitGene Expression ProfilingGene Expression Regulation, PlantGenetic Association StudiesLigninMetabolic Networks and PathwaysPyrusReal-Time Polymerase Chain ReactionSequence Analysis, DNALignin

Identifiers

PMID29088238
PMCPMC5663431
OpenAlexW2765514126

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.