Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29088074›Full record

ArticleAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland)2017

Exploring Patient Awareness and Perceptions of the Appropriate Use of Antibiotics: A Mixed-Methods Study.

Marion E Davis, Tsai-Ling Liu, Yhenneko J Taylor, Lisa Davidson, Monica Schmid, Traci Yates, Janice Scotton, Melanie D Spencer

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland), 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
37citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.6field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

37 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 72 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Marion E DavisCenter for Outcomes Research and Evaluation, Carolinas HealthCare System, Charlotte, NC 28203, USA. Marion.Davis@carolinashealthcare.org.
Tsai-Ling LiuCenter for Outcomes Research and Evaluation, Carolinas HealthCare System, Charlotte, NC 28203, USA. Tsai-Ling.Liu@carolinashealthcare.org.ORCID 0000-0001-6661-082X
Yhenneko J TaylorCenter for Outcomes Research and Evaluation, Carolinas HealthCare System, Charlotte, NC 28203, USA. Yhenneko.Taylor@carolinashealthcare.org.
Lisa DavidsonDepartment of Infectious Disease, Carolinas HealthCare System, Charlotte, NC 28203, USA. Lisa.Davidson@carolinashealthcare.org.
Monica SchmidCenter for Outcomes Research and Evaluation, Carolinas HealthCare System, Charlotte, NC 28203, USA. Monica.Schmidt@carolinashealthcare.org.
Traci YatesCenter for Outcomes Research and Evaluation, Carolinas HealthCare System, Charlotte, NC 28203, USA. Traci.Yates@carolinashealthcare.org.
Janice ScottonPatient Experience, Carolinas HealthCare System, Charlotte, NC 28202, USA. Janice.Scotton@carolinashealthcare.org.
Melanie D SpencerCenter for Outcomes Research and Evaluation, Carolinas HealthCare System, Charlotte, NC 28203, USA. Melanie.Spencer@carolinashealthcare.org.
Carolinas Healthcare System · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the outpatient setting, estimates suggest that 30% of the antibiotics prescribed are unnecessary. This study explores patient knowledge and awareness of appropriate use of antibiotics and expectations regarding how antibiotics are used for their treatment in outpatient settings. A survey was administered to a convenience sample of patients, parents, and caregivers (n = 190) at seven primary care clinics and two urgent care locations. Fisher's exact tests compared results by patient characteristics. Although 89% of patients correctly believed that antibiotics work well for treating infections from bacteria, 53% incorrectly believed that antibiotics work well for treating viral infections. Patients who incorrectly believed that antibiotics work well for treating viral infections were more than twice as likely to expect a provider to give them an antibiotic when they have a cough or common cold. Patients who completed the survey also participated in semi-structured interviews (n = 4), which were analyzed using thematic analysis. Patients reported experiencing confusion about which illnesses may be treated by antibiotics and unclear communication from clinicians about the appropriate use of antibiotics. Development of easy to understand patient educational materials can help address patients' incorrect perceptions of appropriate antibiotic use and facilitate patient-provider communication.

Indexed as

antibiotic resistanceantibioticsbeliefs about antibioticsexpectations about antibioticsmixed-methods researchpatient and provider communication

Identifiers

PMID29088074
PMCPMC5745466
OpenAlexW2765417641

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.