Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29087939›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2017

Efficient gene knockin in axolotl and its use to test the role of satellite cells in limb regeneration.

Ji-Feng Fei, Maritta Schuez, Dunja Knapp, Yuka Taniguchi, David N Drechsel, Elly M Tanaka

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 46 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
46citing papers in PubMed
4.9field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

46 citing papers in PubMed, 132 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Rewinding the clock: mechanisms of dedifferentiation.Current opinion in genetics & development · 2025
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. The salamander blastema within the broader context of metazoan regeneration.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2023
    Review
  15. Now that We Got There, What Next?Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2023
    Article
  16. A Practical Guide for CRISPR-Cas9-Induced Mutations in Axolotls.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2023
    Article
  17. Speciation and adaptation research meets genome editing.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2022
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Inducible and tissue-specific cell labeling in Cre-ERDevelopment, growth & differentiation · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Ji-Feng FeiDeutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG)-Center for Regenerative Therapies Dresden, Technische Universität Dresden, 01307 Dresden, Germany; jifengfei@m.scnu.edu.cn elly.tanaka@imp.ac.at.
Maritta SchuezDeutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG)-Center for Regenerative Therapies Dresden, Technische Universität Dresden, 01307 Dresden, Germany.
Dunja KnappDeutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG)-Center for Regenerative Therapies Dresden, Technische Universität Dresden, 01307 Dresden, Germany.
Yuka TaniguchiDeutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG)-Center for Regenerative Therapies Dresden, Technische Universität Dresden, 01307 Dresden, Germany.
David N DrechselResearch Institute of Molecular Pathology, Vienna Biocenter, 1030 Vienna, Austria.
Elly M TanakaDeutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG)-Center for Regenerative Therapies Dresden, Technische Universität Dresden, 01307 Dresden, Germany; jifengfei@m.scnu.edu.cn elly.tanaka@imp.ac.at.
TU Dresden · DEDeutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft · DEMax Planck Institute of Molecular Cell Biology and Genetics · DEResearch Institute of Molecular Pathology · ATVienna Biocenter · AT

Funding

European Research Council 294324
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Salamanders exhibit extensive regenerative capacities and serve as a unique model in regeneration research. However, due to the lack of targeted gene knockin approaches, it has been difficult to label and manipulate some of the cell populations that are crucial for understanding the mechanisms underlying regeneration. Here we have established highly efficient gene knockin approaches in the axolotl (

Indexed as

Ambystoma mexicanumAnimalsAnimals, Genetically ModifiedCRISPR-Cas SystemsGene Knock-In TechniquesGenes, ReporterGenetic LociIntegrasesLuminescent ProteinsMuscle, SkeletalPAX7 Transcription FactorRed Fluorescent ProteinRegenerationSatellite Cells, Skeletal MuscleSOXB1 Transcription FactorsCre recombinaseIntegrasesLuminescent ProteinsPAX7 Transcription FactorRed Fluorescent ProteinSOXB1 Transcription FactorsCRISPR/Cas9knockinneural stem cellsregenerationsatellite cells

Identifiers

PMID29087939
PMCPMC5703281
OpenAlexW2767112290

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.