Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29087813›Full record

ArticleJournal of studies on alcohol and drugs2017

Receipt of Warnings Regarding Potentially Impairing Prescription Medications and Associated Risk Perceptions in a National Sample of U.S. Drivers.

Robin A Pollini, Geetha Waehrer, Tara Kelley-Baker

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of studies on alcohol and drugs, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Robin A PolliniPacific Institute for Research and Evaluation, Calverton, Maryland.
Geetha WaehrerPacific Institute for Research and Evaluation, Calverton, Maryland.
Tara Kelley-BakerPacific Institute for Research and Evaluation, Calverton, Maryland.
Institute for Research and Evaluation · USPacific Institute For Research and Evaluation · US

Funding

Characterizing Prescription Drug Use in a Representative Sample of U.S. DriversR21DA034950 · NIDA · PACIFIC INSTITUTE FOR RES AND EVALUATION · PI KELLEY-BAKER, TARA D, POLLINI, ROBIN A · 2013 to 2014
$422k
NIDA NIH HHS R21 DA034950
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveReducing drug-involved driving is a national policy priority, but little is known about the extent to which drivers receive warnings about the impairment potential of their prescribed medications. We used data from the 2013-2014 National Roadside Survey (NRS) to quantify the proportion of drivers who received warnings regarding potentially impairing medications and the association with driving-related risk perceptions.

methodDrivers randomly selected at 60 sites completed the self-administered survey, which contained questions on their use of prescription medications.

resultsOverall, 7,405 drivers completed the prescription drug portion of the NRS. Of these, 19.7% reported recent use (within the past 2 days) of a potentially impairing prescription drug, and 78.2% said the drug had been prescribed for their use. Users of prescribed sedatives (85.8%) and narcotics (85.1%) were most likely to report receiving information about potential impairment, compared with only 57.7% and 62.6% of users of prescribed stimulant and antidepressant medications, respectively. Receipt of warnings varied by sex, race/ethnicity, income, geographic region, and time of day. For a majority of drug categories, drivers who reported receiving warnings had significantly higher odds of perceived risk of impaired driving/crash and criminal justice involvement.

conclusionsMost users of prescription medications reported that the drug was prescribed for their use, but not all reported receiving warnings about driving impairment. Our study provides evidence of missed opportunities for information provision on impaired driving, identifies subgroups that may warrant enhanced interventions, and provides preliminary evidence that receipt of impairment warnings is associated with increased perceptions of driving-related risk.

Indexed as

AdultAntidepressive AgentsAutomobile DrivingCentral Nervous System StimulantsFemaleHumansHypnotics and SedativesMaleNarcoticsPrescription DrugsSurveys and QuestionnairesAntidepressive AgentsCentral Nervous System StimulantsHypnotics and SedativesNarcoticsPrescription Drugs

Identifiers

PMID29087813
PMCPMC5668990
OpenAlexW2766646153

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.