Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29087761›Full record

Observational studyHuman vaccines & immunotherapeutics2018

The safety of influenza vaccine in clinically cured leprosy patients in China.

Yi Zheng, Li Chen, Jie Zou, Zheng-Gang Zhu, Li Zhu, Jing Wan, Quan Hu

Open access · bronzeAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 35% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Observational
  3. 100 years since the 1918 influenza pandemic.Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics · 2018
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Yi Zhenga Department of Leprosy , Wuhan Institute of Dermatology and Venereology , Wuhan , China.
Li Chenb Department of Immunization , Jianghan Center for Disease Prevention and Control , Wuhan , China.
Jie Zoua Department of Leprosy , Wuhan Institute of Dermatology and Venereology , Wuhan , China.
Zheng-Gang Zhuc Department of Immunization , Wuhan Center for Disease Prevention and Control , Wuhan , China.
Li Zhua Department of Leprosy , Wuhan Institute of Dermatology and Venereology , Wuhan , China.
Jing Wana Department of Leprosy , Wuhan Institute of Dermatology and Venereology , Wuhan , China.
Quan Hua Department of Leprosy , Wuhan Institute of Dermatology and Venereology , Wuhan , China.
Wuhan Center for Disease Control and Prevention · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLeprosy is an infectious disease caused by the bacterium Mycobacterium leprae. Influenza vaccine is an important influenza prevention strategy and the preparations used display good safety and tolerability profiles. But the safety of applying influenza vaccine on the clinical cured leprosy patients is unclear.

methodsWe conducted an observational clinical study, in Wuhan between November 15, 2016 and March 1, 2017. Two groups of participants ≥50 years of age received a 0.5 ml dose of the inactivated split-virion trivalent influenza vaccine and a follow-up 28 days observation of any solicited and unsolicited adverse events.

resultsA total of 134 subjects were included in the study. The total rate of reactogenicity was 5.4% [2/37] in leprosy group and 15.5% [15/ 97] in control group, the difference of reactogenicity between two groups was not significant (p = 0.1522). For solicited injection-sites adverse events (AEs), 12.4% [12/ 97] participants in the control group reported of itching, pain, erythema, swelling or induration, and no participants in leprosy group reported of any solicited injection-sites AEs. For solicited systemic AEs, 7.2% [7 / 97] participants in the control group reported of fever, malaise or headache, and 2.7% [1 / 37] participants in the leprosy group reported of fever, statistic result showed that the difference was not significant (p = 0.4438). Unsolicited AEs was reported by one male aged 76, 4 hours after vaccination administration, his plantar ulcer area began bleeding. All AEs were grade 1 or grade 2, and no recurrence of lepra reaction, AEs leading to early withdrawal from the study, or deaths were reported in this study.

conclusionsTo our knowledge, the present study is the first clinical study to evaluate the safety of influenza vaccine in clinically cured leprosy patients. We concluded that clinically cured leprosy patients are relatively safe for influenza vaccine. More importantly, our study make a positive and scientific efforts to eradicate discrimination on leprosy. In our study, we described a patient with plantar ulcer undergoing bleeding for 4 hours after vaccine administration. Based on evidence we have, we interpret that this adverse event may probably associated with vaccine, and patients with ulcer and leprosy need intensive attention after vaccines administration.

Indexed as

AgedAged, 80 and overAntibodies, ViralChinaFemaleHemagglutination Inhibition TestsHumansInfluenza, HumanInfluenza VaccinesLeprosyMaleMiddle AgedVaccinationVaccines, InactivatedAntibodies, ViralInfluenza VaccinesVaccines, InactivatedInfluenza VaccineLeprosyReactogenicitySafetyUlcer

Identifiers

PMID29087761
PMCPMC5861811
OpenAlexW2766277371

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.