Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29087490›Full record

ArticleNucleic acids research2018

Genomicus 2018: karyotype evolutionary trees and on-the-fly synteny computing.

Nga Thi Thuy Nguyen, Pierre Vincens, Hugues Roest Crollius, Alexandra Louis

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Nucleic acids research, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 67 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
67citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

67 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Fine-tuning neuron number:bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. A trade-off between proliferation and defense in the fungal pathogenbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. From worms to humans: Understanding intestinal lipid metabolism via model organisms.Biochimica et biophysica acta. Molecular and cell biology of lipids · 2023
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Genome-Wide Identification ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Article

7 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Nga Thi Thuy NguyenEcole Normale Supérieure, Institut de Biologie de l'ENS, IBENS, Paris F-75005, France.
Pierre VincensEcole Normale Supérieure, Institut de Biologie de l'ENS, IBENS, Paris F-75005, France.
Hugues Roest CrolliusEcole Normale Supérieure, Institut de Biologie de l'ENS, IBENS, Paris F-75005, France.
Alexandra LouisEcole Normale Supérieure, Institut de Biologie de l'ENS, IBENS, Paris F-75005, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Since 2010, the Genomicus web server is available online at http://genomicus.biologie.ens.fr/genomicus. This graphical browser provides access to comparative genomic analyses in four different phyla (Vertebrate, Plants, Fungi, and non vertebrate Metazoans). Users can analyse genomic information from extant species, as well as ancestral gene content and gene order for vertebrates and flowering plants, in an integrated evolutionary context. New analyses and visualization tools have recently been implemented in Genomicus Vertebrate. Karyotype structures from several genomes can now be compared along an evolutionary pathway (Multi-KaryotypeView), and synteny blocks can be computed and visualized between any two genomes (PhylDiagView).

Indexed as

Databases, GeneticEvolution, MolecularKaryotypePhylogenySyntenyAlgorithmsAnimalsData DisplayFungiGenomePlantsSoftwareVertebrates

Identifiers

PMID29087490
PMCPMC5753199

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.