ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2017
Nasal airflow simulations suggest convergent adaptation in Neanderthals and modern humans.
Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- The first preserved nasal cavity in the human fossil record: The Neanderthal from Altamura.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025Article
- Neandertal Cold Adaptation: Technological, Anatomical, and Physiological Responses to Cold Stress in One of Our Closest Fossil Relatives.American journal of human biology : the official journal of the Human Biology Council · 2025Article
- Combined genome-wide association study of facial traits in Europeans increases explained variance and improves prediction.Nature communications · 2025Article
- Thermal Adaptations in Animals: Genes, Development, and Evolution.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2024Review
- Icex: Advances in the automatic extraction and volume calculation of cranial cavities.Journal of anatomy · 2023Article
- New insights into the variability of upper airway morphology in modern humans.Journal of anatomy · 2023Article
- Article
- Respiratory adaptation to climate in modern humans and Upper Palaeolithic individuals from Sungir and Mladeč.Scientific reports · 2021Article
- Reply to Evteev and Heuzé: How to overcome the problem of modeling respiration departing from bony structures.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2018Article
- Impact of sampling strategies and reconstruction protocols in nasal airflow simulations in fossil hominins.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2018Article
- Computer simulations show that Neanderthal facial morphology represents adaptation to cold and high energy demands, but not heavy biting.Proceedings. Biological sciences · 2018Article
- Developmental pathways inferred from modularity, morphological integration and fluctuating asymmetry patterns in the human face.Scientific reports · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
18 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Both modern humans (MHs) and Neanderthals successfully settled across western Eurasian cold-climate landscapes. Among the many adaptations considered as essential to survival in such landscapes, changes in the nasal morphology and/or function aimed to humidify and warm the air before it reaches the lungs are of key importance. Unfortunately, the lack of soft-tissue evidence in the fossil record turns difficult any comparative study of respiratory performance. Here, we reconstruct the internal nasal cavity of a Neanderthal plus two representatives of climatically divergent MH populations (southwestern Europeans and northeastern Asians). The reconstruction includes mucosa distribution enabling a realistic simulation of the breathing cycle in different climatic conditions via computational fluid dynamics. Striking across-specimens differences in fluid residence times affecting humidification and warming performance at the anterior tract were found under cold/dry climate simulations. Specifically, the Asian model achieves a rapid air conditioning, followed by the Neanderthals, whereas the European model attains a proper conditioning only around the medium-posterior tract. In addition, quantitative-genetic evolutionary analyses of nasal morphology provided signals of stabilizing selection for MH populations, with the removal of Arctic populations turning covariation patterns compatible with evolution by genetic drift. Both results indicate that, departing from important craniofacial differences existing among Neanderthals and MHs, an advantageous species-specific respiratory performance in cold climates may have occurred in both species. Fluid dynamics and evolutionary biology independently provided evidence of nasal evolution, suggesting that adaptive explanations regarding complex functional phenotypes require interdisciplinary approaches aimed to quantify both performance and evolutionary signals on covariation patterns.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.