Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29086918›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of physiology2018

Rapid recovery and altered neurochemical dependence of locomotor central pattern generation following lumbar neonatal spinal cord injury.

Mark Züchner, Elena Kondratskaya, Camilla B Sylte, Joel C Glover, Jean-Luc Boulland

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of physiology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Mark ZüchnerLaboratory of Neural Development and Optical Recording (NDEVOR), Division of Physiology, Department of Molecular Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
Elena KondratskayaLaboratory of Neural Development and Optical Recording (NDEVOR), Division of Physiology, Department of Molecular Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
Camilla B SylteLaboratory of Neural Development and Optical Recording (NDEVOR), Division of Physiology, Department of Molecular Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
Joel C GloverLaboratory of Neural Development and Optical Recording (NDEVOR), Division of Physiology, Department of Molecular Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
Jean-Luc BoullandLaboratory of Neural Development and Optical Recording (NDEVOR), Division of Physiology, Department of Molecular Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.ORCID 0000-0002-7272-357X
Oslo University Hospital · NOUniversity of Oslo · NO

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

key pointsSpinal compression injury targeted to the neonatal upper lumbar spinal cord, the region of highest hindlimb locomotor rhythmogenicity, leads to an initial paralysis of the hindlimbs. Behavioural recovery is evident within a few days and approaches normal function within about 3 weeks. Fictive locomotion in the isolated injured spinal cord cannot be elicited by a neurochemical cocktail containing NMDA, dopamine and serotonin 1 day post-injury, but can 3 days post-injury as readily as in the uninjured spinal cord. Low frequency coordinated rhythmic activity can be elicited in the isolated uninjured spinal cord by NMDA + dopamine (without serotonin), but not in the isolated injured spinal cord. In both the injured and uninjured spinal cord, eliciting bona fide fictive locomotion requires the additional presence of serotonin. ABSTRACT: Following incomplete compression injury in the thoracic spinal cord of neonatal mice 1 day after birth (P1), we previously reported that virtually normal hindlimb locomotor function is recovered within about 3 weeks despite substantial permanent thoracic tissue loss. Here, we asked whether similar recovery occurs following lumbar injury that impacts more directly on the locomotor central pattern generator (CPG). As in thoracic injuries, lumbar injuries caused about 90% neuronal loss at the injury site and increased serotonergic innervation below the injury. Motor recovery was slower after lumbar than thoracic injury, but virtually normal function was attained by P25 in both cases. Locomotor CPG status was tested by eliciting fictive locomotion in isolated spinal cords using a widely used neurochemical cocktail (NMDA, dopamine, serotonin). No fictive locomotion could be elicited 1 day post-injury, but could within 3 days post-injury as readily as in age-matched uninjured control spinal cords. Burst patterning and coordination were largely similar in injured and control spinal cords but there were differences. Notably, in both groups there were two main locomotor frequencies, but injured spinal cords exhibited a shift towards the higher frequency. Injury also altered the neurochemical dependence of locomotor CPG output, such that injured spinal cords, unlike control spinal cords, were incapable of generating low frequency rhythmic coordinated activity in the presence of NMDA and dopamine alone. Thus, the neonatal spinal cord also exhibits remarkable functional recovery after lumbar injuries, but the neurochemical sensitivity of locomotor circuitry is modified in the process.

Indexed as

Recovery of FunctionAnimalsAnimals, NewbornCentral Pattern GeneratorsDopamineDopamine AgentsExcitatory Amino Acid AgonistsFemaleHindlimbLocomotionMaleMiceMice, Inbred ICRMotor NeuronsN-MethylaspartateSerotoninDopamineDopamine AgentsExcitatory Amino Acid AgonistsN-MethylaspartateSerotoninSerotonin Receptor Agonistsadaptive plasticitynetwork re-organizationrecoveryspinal cord injurysprouting

Identifiers

PMID29086918
PMCPMC5767688
OpenAlexW2766670851

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.